Abstract:Adult attachment style has consequences for mental health, interpersonal functioning and emotion regulation. This occurs partly deliberately, also referred to as explicit, and partly on an automatic level outside of conscious awareness, also referred to as implicit. Whereas explicit adult attachment can be assessed with self-report instruments, measurement of implicit adult attachment requires indirect methods. This paper describes the psychometric properties of two Implicit Association Tests measuring general adult attachment in a population sample. The study evaluated the reliability and the validity of the Avoidant Attachment IAT (ANX-IAT) and the Anxious Attachment IAT (AVOID-IAT). Validity was evaluated against self-report measures of adult attachment style (RQ), psychopathology (SQ-48), and well-being (MHC-SF). The split-half reliabilities of both IATs were good; the test-retest reliability of the ANX-IAT was adequate; however the AVOID-IAT had low test-retest reliability. Both IATs did not explain variance in psychopathology additional to explicit measures. The AVOID-IAT showed added value over explicit measurement of avoidant attachment in explaining variance in well-being, particularly regarding emotional and psychological well-being. The ANX-IAT did not explain variance in any measure of well-being additional to the explicit measure of anxious attachment. Our findings provide a basis from which more valid IATs measuring general adult attachment can be developed. Furthermore, they suggest that implicit avoidant attachment might be related to well-being, particularly emotional and psychological well-being. However, further research is needed to investigate the role of implicit general adult attachment in mental health and to optimize the two IATs in terms of validity before clinical use is recommended. Published on 2021-03-16 09:33:07

Validity of the salience asymmetry interpretation of the implicit association test: comment on Rothermund and Wentura (2004)

Underlying Processes in the Implicit Association Test(IAT):A Review of the Literature

Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.

Reproducibility of Implicit Association Test (IAT) -- Case study of meta-analysis of racial bias research claims

Improving the reliability and validity of the IAT with a dynamic model driven by similarity

Initial evidence of reliability and validity of an implicit association test assessing attitudes toward individuals who use substances

The Implicit Association Test and its difficulty(ies): Introducing the test difficulty concept to increase the true-score variance and, consequently, the predictive power of implicit association tests.

Beyond Reaction Times: Incorporating Mouse-Tracking Measures into the Implicit Association Test to Examine Its Underlying Process

Negative or positive left or right? The influence of attribute label position on IAT effects in picture-word IATs and word IATs

Decoupling implicit measures of pleasant and unpleasant social attitudes

The role of perceptual similarities in determining the asymmetric mixed-category advantage.

Black and White: the Role of Color Bias in Implicit Race Bias

Is contact with people with disabilities a guarantee for positive implicit and explicit attitudes?

Psychometric Properties of Two Implicit Associations Tests measuring Adult Attachment

Detrimental effects of using negative sentences in the autobiographical IAT

Assessing motivational biases in brain and behavior: Event‐related potential and response time concomitants of the approach–avoidance task

Improving Our Understanding of the Death/Life Implicit Association Test

Determinants of automatic age and race bias: ingroup-outgroup distinction salience moderates automatic evaluations of social groups

Does ROC asymmetry reverse when detecting new stimuli? Reinvestigating whether the retrievability of mnemonic information is task-dependent

Individual differences in emotion-induced blindness: Are they reliable and what do they measure?

Detecting Compromised Implicit Association Test Results Using Supervised Learning