Abstract:Background: Blood flow restriction (BFR) training restricts arterial inflow and venous outflow from the extremity and can produce gains in muscle strength at low loads. Low-load training reduces joint stress and decreases cardiovascular risk when compared with high-load training, thus making BFR an excellent option for many patients requiring rehabilitation. Indications: Blood flow restriction has shown clinical benefit in a variety of patient populations including healthy patients as well as those with osteoarthritis, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, polymyositis/dermatomyositis, and Achilles tendon rupture. Technique Description: This video demonstrates BFR training in 3 clinical areas: upper extremity resistance training, lower extremity resistance training, and low-intensity cycling. All applications of BFR first require determination of total occlusion pressure. Upper extremity training requires inflating the tourniquet to 50% of total occlusion pressure, while lower extremity exercises use 80% of total occlusion pressure. Low-load resistance training exercises follow a specific repetition scheme: 30 reps followed by a 30-second rest and then 3 sets of 15 reps with 30-seconds rest between each. During cycle training, 80% total occlusion pressure is used as the patient cycles for 15 minutes without rest. Results: Augmenting low-load resistance training with BFR increases muscle strength when compared with low-load resistance alone. In addition, low-load BFR has demonstrated an increase in muscle mass greater than low-load training alone and equivalent to high-load training absent BFR. A systematic review determined the safety of low-load training with BFR is comparable to traditional high-intensity resistance training. The most common adverse effects include exercise intolerance, discomfort, and dull pain which are also frequent in patients undergoing traditional resistance training. Severe adverse effects including deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and rhabdomyolysis are exceedingly rare, less than 0.006% according to a national survey. Patients undergoing BFR rehabilitation experience less perceived exertion and demonstrate decreased pain scores compared with high-load resistance training. Conclusion: Blood flow restriction training is an effective alternative to high-load resistance training for patients requiring musculoskeletal rehabilitation for multiple disease processes as well as in the perioperative setting. Blood flow restriction has been shown to be a safe training modality when managed by properly trained physical therapists and athletic trainers.

Is physical training contraindicated in patients with deep vein thrombosis during cardiac rehabilitation?

Rehabilitation in the Setting of Untreated Cancer-Associated Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis

The safety and efficacy of early-initiation exercise training after acute venous thromboembolism: a randomized clinical trial

High level physical activity in cardiac rehabilitation: Implications for exercise training and leisure-time pursuits

Dynamic strength training intensity in cardiovascular rehabilitation: is it time to reconsider clinical practice? A systematic review

Isolated Calf Muscle Venous Thrombosis: A Review of Anticoagulation Strategies

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing, Rehabilitation, and Exercise Training in Postpulmonary Embolism

Physical fitness changes induced by thermal aquatic standardized exercise in chronic venous disease patients

Exercise Training in Patients with Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension and Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Intensive Inpatient Neurorehabilitation Unit

Management of isolated distal deep vein thrombosis

Anticoagulation in Patients with Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis: Bringing the Puzzle Together

Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Rehabilitation: a Review and Practice Suggestions

Blood Flow Restriction Therapy Impact on Musculoskeletal Strength and Mass

Anticoagulation and compression therapy for proximal acute deep vein thrombosis

Does intermittent pneumatic compression reduce the risk of post stroke deep vein thrombosis? The CLOTS 3 trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Preventive and therapeutic approach to venous thromboembolic disease and pulmonary embolism—can death from pulmonary embolism be prevented?

Strategies of Return-to-Play After Specific Cardiovascular Entities

Which Frequency of Ankle Pump Exercise Should Be Chosen for the Prophylaxis of Deep Vein Thrombosis?

Thrombosis and Thrombotic Risk in Athletes

Pulmonary rehabilitation and physical interventions