Analysis of claims that the brain extracellular impedance is high and non-resistive

Boris Barbour
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2017.05.054
2017-03-27
Abstract:Numerous measurements in the brain of the impedance between two extracellular electrodes have shown that it is approximately resistive in the range of biological interest, $<10\,$kHz, and has a value close to that expected from the conductivity of physiological saline and the extracellular volume fraction in brain tissue. Recent work from the group of Claude Bédard and Alain Destexhe has claimed that the impedance of the extracellular space is some three orders of magnitude greater than these values and also displays a $1/\sqrt{f}$ frequency dependence (above a low-frequency corner frequency). Their measurements were performed between an intracellular electrode and an extracellular electrode. It is argued that they incorrectly extracted the extracellular impedance because of an inaccurate representation of the large, confounding impedance of the neuronal membrane. In conclusion, no compelling evidence has been provided to undermine the well established and physically plausible consensus that the brain extracellular impedance is low and approximately resistive
Neurons and Cognition
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to analyze and refute certain recent research conclusions regarding brain extracellular impedance. Specifically, the recent study by Claude Bédard and Alain Destexhe claims that the impedance of the brain's extracellular space is three orders of magnitude higher than previously measured and exhibits a \(1/\sqrt{f}\) frequency dependence (above a low-frequency cutoff). These new findings contradict the consensus from a large body of previous research, which concluded that brain extracellular impedance is approximately resistive and close to the expected values for physiological saline and the extracellular volume fraction of brain tissue. The author of the paper, Boris Barbour, believes that there are issues with the research methods used by Bédard and Destexhe's team. The main problem is that they measured impedance by conducting current from an intracellular electrode to an extracellular electrode, a setup that introduces the high impedance of the neuronal membrane as a confounding factor. Barbour points out that due to the significant influence of neuronal membrane impedance, it is very difficult to accurately extract extracellular impedance from this measurement configuration. Bédard and Destexhe's team failed to account for these confounding factors with sufficient precision, leading to potentially erroneous conclusions. In summary, the paper attempts to address the issue of verifying or refuting the new findings on brain extracellular impedance proposed by Bédard and Destexhe's team and to assess whether these findings can overturn the widely accepted views on the nature of brain extracellular impedance.