Abstract:Abstract Characterizing the nature of the adaptive process at the genetic level is a central goal for population genetics. In particular, we know little about the sources of adaptive substitution or about the number of adaptive variants currently segregating in nature. Historically, population geneticists have focused attention on the hard-sweep model of adaptation in which a de novo beneficial mutation arises and rapidly fixes in a population. Recently more attention has been given to soft-sweep models, in which alleles that were previously neutral, or nearly so, drift until such a time as the environment shifts and their selection coefficient changes to become beneficial. It remains an active and difficult problem, however, to tease apart the telltale signatures of hard vs. soft sweeps in genomic polymorphism data. Through extensive simulations of hard- and soft-sweep models, here we show that indeed the two might not be separable through the use of simple summary statistics. In particular, it seems that recombination in regions linked to, but distant from, sites of hard sweeps can create patterns of polymorphism that closely mirror what is expected to be found near soft sweeps. We find that a very similar situation arises when using haplotype-based statistics that are aimed at detecting partial or ongoing selective sweeps, such that it is difficult to distinguish the shoulder of a hard sweep from the center of a partial sweep. While knowing the location of the selected site mitigates this problem slightly, we show that stochasticity in signatures of natural selection will frequently cause the signal to reach its zenith far from this site and that this effect is more severe for soft sweeps; thus inferences of the target as well as the mode of positive selection may be inaccurate. In addition, both the time since a sweep ends and biologically realistic levels of allelic gene conversion lead to errors in the classification and identification of selective sweeps. This general problem of “soft shoulders” underscores the difficulty in differentiating soft and partial sweeps from hard-sweep scenarios in molecular population genomics data. The soft-shoulder effect also implies that the more common hard sweeps have been in recent evolutionary history, the more prevalent spurious signatures of soft or partial sweeps may appear in some genome-wide scans.

Ancestry in adapting, spatially-extended populations

Signatures of selective sweeps in continuous-space populations

Genetic diversity during selective sweeps in non-recombining populations

A Coalescent Model of a Sweep from a Uniquely Derived Standing Variant

A Coalescent Model for a Sweep of a Unique Standing Variant

Genealogies of rapidly adapting populations

Genetic draft, selective interference, and population genetics of rapid adaptation

Identifying and Classifying Shared Selective Sweeps from Multilocus Data

Ancestry Variation and Footprints of Natural Selection along the Genome in Latin American Populations

Broad-scale variation in human genetic diversity levels is predicted by purifying selection on coding and non-coding elements

Population Genetics Models of Local Ancestry

Genome-wide sweeps create fundamental ecological units in the human gut microbiome

Archaic introgression and the distribution of shared variation under stabilizing selection

Localizing Post-Admixture Adaptive Variants with Object Detection on Ancestry-Painted Chromosomes

Soft Shoulders Ahead: Spurious Signatures of Soft and Partial Selective Sweeps Result from Linked Hard Sweeps

Interference limits resolution of selection pressures from linked neutral diversity

The ancestry of a genome

On the unfounded enthusiasm for soft selective sweeps II: Examining recent evidence from humans, flies, and viruses

Modeling recent positive selection in Americans of European ancestry

Fixation times of de novo and standing beneficial variants in subdivided populations

Selective sweep probabilities in spatially expanding populations