Abstract:The authors propose robust adaptive strategies based on stochastic minimax optimization for a series of simulated treatments on a one-dimensional patient phantom. The plan applied during the first fractions should be able to handle anticipated systematic and random errors. At scheduled fractions, the impact of the measured errors on the delivered dose distribution is evaluated. For a patient receiving a dose that does not satisfy clinical goals, the plan is reoptimized based on these individually measured errors. The adapted plan is then applied during subsequent fractions until a new scheduled adaptation becomes necessary. In the first adaptive strategy, the measured systematic and random error scenarios and their assigned probabilities are updated to guide the robust reoptimization. In the second strategy, the grade of conservativeness is adapted in response to the measured dose delivery errors. In the third strategy, the uncertainty margins around the target are recalculated based on the measured errors. The simulated systematic and random errors are either similar to the anticipated errors or unpredictably larger, in order to critically evaluate the performance of the adaptive strategies. The simulations show that robustly optimized treatment plans provide sufficient treatment quality for those treatment error scenarios similar to the anticipated error scenarios. Combining robust planning with adaptation leads to improved OAR protection. In case of unpredictably larger treatment errors, the first strategy performs best at improving treatment quality in terms of target coverage and OAR protection. According to the simulations, these robust adaptive treatment strategies are able to identify candidates for an adaptive treatment, thus giving the opportunity to provide individualized plans, and improve their treatment quality through adaptation.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to solve the problem of geometric uncertainty in radiotherapy, especially the impact of inter - fractional geometric changes on the quality of treatment. The authors propose a framework that combines robust treatment planning and adaptive re - optimization to maintain high - quality treatment, respond to inter - fractional geometric changes, and identify patients who can benefit the most from adaptive fractionation regimens. ### Purpose of the paper - **Maintain high - quality treatment**: Through robust optimization and adaptive re - optimization, ensure that high - quality treatment can still be provided in the presence of geometric uncertainty. - **Respond to geometric changes**: By monitoring the geometric changes in each fraction, evaluate the impact of these changes on the dose distribution, and re - optimize the plan when necessary. - **Identify benefited patients**: By simulating and evaluating different adaptive strategies, determine which patients can benefit the most from adaptive treatment. ### Methods 1. **Robust adaptive strategies**: - Based on stochastic minimax optimization, three different adaptive strategies are proposed to simulate geometric changes during the treatment process. - **First strategy**: Update the measured systematic and random error scenarios and their probabilities to guide robust re - optimization. - **Second strategy**: Adjust the degree of conservatism according to the measured dose - delivery errors. - **Third strategy**: Recalculate the safety margin of the target area based on the measured errors. 2. **Simulation study**: - Use a one - dimensional patient model for simulation, considering systematic and random errors. - Simulate two different populations: a small - error population with errors similar to expectations, and a large - error population with errors significantly larger than expected. - Evaluate the impact of different adaptive strategies and adaptation frequencies on treatment quality and organ protection. ### Results - **Robust optimization plan**: In the case where the errors are similar to expectations, the robust optimization plan can provide sufficient treatment quality. - **Combination of robust optimization and adaptability**: In the large - error population, the first strategy combined with once - a - week adaptive re - optimization performs the best, significantly improving target coverage and organ protection. - **Identify benefited patients**: Through simulation, the patient groups that can benefit the most from adaptive treatment are identified. ### Conclusions The authors propose a framework that combines robust optimization and adaptive re - optimization, which can effectively deal with inter - fractional geometric changes and improve treatment quality. Through simulation studies, the effectiveness of this framework is verified, and it provides guidance for the future development of optimally - controlled robust adaptive treatment models. ### Formulas - **CTV - PTV margin formula**: \[ m = 1.96\Sigma_{\text{tot}}+ 0.7\sigma_{\text{tot}} \] where \(\Sigma_{\text{tot}}\) and \(\sigma_{\text{tot}}\) represent the standard deviations of the overall systematic and random errors, respectively. - **Optimization objective function**: \[ \text{minimize}\quad x\in X\quad\sum_{r\in R}w_r f_r(d) \] where \(R\) represents the regions of interest, \(w_r\) is the importance weight of the corresponding region, and \(f_r(d)\) is the objective function in the form of a quadratic penalty function: \[ f_r(d)=\sum_{v\in V_r}\Delta_{v,r}(d_v - \hat{d}_r)^2 \] - **Robust optimization problem**: \[ \text{minimize}\quad x\in X\quad\max_{0\leq\pi\leq1,\alpha p,e^T\pi = 1}E_\pi\left[\max_{0\leq\rho\leq1,\alpha p_\sigma,e^T\rho = 1}E_\rho\left[E_q(\sigma_U)\left[f(d(x,S,U,T))\right]\right]\right]

Towards Robust Adaptive Radiation Therapy Strategies

On the Interplay between Robustness and Dynamic Planning for Adaptive Radiation Therapy

On adaptation cost and tractability in robust adaptive radiation therapy optimization

Robust optimization strategies for contour uncertainties in online adaptive radiation therapy

Selective robust optimization

Adaptive intensity modulated proton therapy using 4D robust planning: a proof-of-concept for the application of dose mimicking approach

Optimal treatment plan adaptation using mid-treatment imaging biomarkers

A fast and robust constraint-based online re-optimization approach for automated online adaptive intensity modulated proton therapy in head and neck cancer

Robust automated radiation therapy treatment planning using scenario-specific dose prediction and robust dose mimicking

Balancing robustness and adaptation rate for proton therapy of lung cancer patients

Robust optimization and assessment of dynamic trajectory and mixed-beam arc radiotherapy: a preliminary study

Real-time adaptive planning method for radiotherapy treatment delivery for prostate cancer patients, based on a library of plans accounting for possible anatomy configuration changes

Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy

Robust spatiotemporal fractionation schemes in the presence of patient setup uncertainty

Dosimetric advantages of adaptive IMPT vs. Enhanced workload and treatment time - A need for automation

The partial adaptation strategy for online‐adaptive proton therapy: A proof of concept study in head and neck cancer patients

Robust treatment planning with 4D intensity modulated carbon ion therapy for multiple targets in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

Robust and probabilistic optimization of dose schedules in radiotherapy

TU-EF-304-01: BEST IN PHYSICS (THERAPY): Plan Robustness and Optimality Improvement with 4-Dimensional Robust Optimization for Lung Cancer Patients

Beyond conventional bounds: Surpassing system limits for stereotactic ablative (SAbR) lung radiotherapy using CBCT‐based adaptive planning system

Robust Direct Aperture Optimization for Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning