Abstract:After many years of research across disciplines, it remains unclear whether people are more motivated to seek appraisals that accurately match self-views (self-verification) or are as favorable as possible (self-enhancement). Within sociology, mixed findings in identity theory have fueled the debate. A problem here is that a commonly employed statistical approach does not take into account the direction of a discrepancy between how we see ourselves and how we think others see us in terms of a given identity, yet doing so is critical for determining which self-motive is at play. We offer a test of three competing models of identity processes, including a new "mixed motivations" model where self-verification and self-enhancement operate simultaneously. We compare the models using the conventional statistical approach versus response surface analysis. The latter method allows us to determine whether identity discrepancies involving over-evaluation are as distressing as those involving under-evaluation. We use nationally representative data and compare results across four different identities and multiple outcomes. The two statistical approaches lead to the same conclusions more often than not and mostly support identity theory and its assumption that people seek self-verification. However, response surface tests reveal patterns that are mistaken as evidence of self-verification by conventional procedures, especially for the spouse identity. We also find that identity discrepancies have different effects on distress and self-conscious emotions (guilt and shame). Our findings have implications not only for research on self and identity across disciplines, but also for many other areas of research that incorporate these concepts and/or use difference scores as explanatory variables.

Mirror and camera self-focusing effects on complexity of private and public aspects of identity

Self-focus and stereotyping of the self

The effect of self-focused attention during mirror gazing on body image evaluations, appearance-related imagery and urge to mirror gaze

The true self in reflections? Visual self‐recognition and the Big Five

Archetypal-imaging and mirror-gazing

Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection.

A reflection on faces seen under mirror reversal

Principal component analysis: development and initial validation of the mirror effects inventory

Discerning Selfiers: Differences between Taking and Sharing Selfies

Self-Processing and Self-Face Reaction Time Latencies: A Review

Me, myself and you: How self-consciousness influences time perception

Stroop interference, self-focus and perfectionism in social phobics

Possible self-complexity and affective reactions to goal-relevant evaluation

Self-complexity, self-evaluation, and depression: an examination of form and content within the self-schema

Self-Complexity and Self-Concept Differentiation - What Have We Been Measuring for the Past 30 Years?

Who Uses the All-Time Mirror on Zoom? Is Self-Referent Gaze Behavior During Virtual Interactions Diagnostic of Trait or State Personality Characteristics?

To thine own self be true? Clarifying the effects of identity discrepancies on psychological distress and emotions

[Effects of structure of self-knowledge on mood-incongruent effect]

Self-schemata and processing information about the self.

Validating a new measure of self-complexity

Affective compatibility with the self modulates the self-prioritisation effect