Abstract:The problem of scheduling unrelated machines has been studied since the inception of algorithmic mechanism design (Nisan and Ronen, Algorithmic mechanism design(extended abstract). In: Proceedings of the Thirty First Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 129–140, 1999. It is a resource allocation problem that entails assigning m tasks to n machines for execution. Machines are regarded as strategic agents who may lie about their execution costs so as to minimize their time cost. To address the situation when monetary payment is not an option to compensate the machines' costs, Koutsoupias (Theory Comput Syst 54:375–387, 2014) devised two truthful mechanisms, K and P respectively, that achieves an approximation ratio of and n , for social cost minimization. In addition, no truthful mechanism can achieve an approximation ratio better than . Hence, mechanism K is optimal. While the approximation ratio provides a strong worst-case guarantee, it also limits us to a comprehensive understanding of mechanism performance on various inputs. This paper investigates these two scheduling mechanisms beyond the worst case. We first show that mechanism K achieves a smaller social cost than mechanism P on every input. That is, mechanism K is pointwise better than mechanism P. Next, for each task, when machines' execution costs are independent and identically drawn from a task-specific distribution, we show that the average-case approximation ratio of mechanism K converges to a constant determined by the task-specific distribution. This bound is tight for mechanism K. For a better understanding of this distribution-dependent constant, on the one hand, we estimate its value by plugging in a few common distributions; on the other, we show that this converging bound improves a known bound (Zhang in Algorithmica 83(6):1638–1652, 2021)) which only captures the single-task setting. Last, we find that the average-case approximation ratio of mechanism P converges to the same constant.

An almost ideal coordination mechanism for unrelated machine scheduling

Mixed Coordination Mechanisms for Scheduling Games on Hierarchical Machines

Coordination Mechanisms for Scheduling Games with Machine Modification.

Coordination Mechanisms for Scheduling Games with Proportional Deterioration.

Coordination mechanisms for selfish parallel jobs scheduling

Efficient coordination mechanisms for unrelated machine scheduling

Inefficiency of Equilibria for Scheduling Game with Machine Activation Costs

A note on the lower bound for the Price of Anarchy of scheduling games on unrelated machines

Price of Anarchy of Scheduling Games on Hierarchical Machines with Quadratic Social Cost

Scheduling Game with Machine Modification in the Random Setting

On the machine scheduling problem with job delivery coordination

Inefficiency of Nash equilibria with parallel processing policy

A Note on Hierarchical Scheduling on Two Uniform Machines

On the Price of Anarchy of Two-Stage Machine Scheduling Games

Inefficiency of Equilibria for the Machine Covering Game on Uniform Machines

Inefficiency of Nash Equilibrium for scheduling games with constrained jobs: A parametric analysis.

Approximating the Optimal Competitive Ratio for an Ancient Online Scheduling Problem

Non-clairvoyant Scheduling Games

On Scheduling Mechanisms Beyond the Worst Case

Efficient Mechanism Design for Online Scheduling.

Sequential solutions in machine scheduling games