Abstract:Reliability-based design and analysis in geotechnical engineering requires input parameters, such as soil properties, to be probabilistically characterized. This generally requires a large number of sitespecific data. However, site-specific data is often sparse and limited, particularly for geotechnical projects with small to medium sizes. To facilitate the probabilistic characterization of soil property of interest (e.g., effective friction angle, phi', of soil), Bayesian equivalent sample approach has been developed. It systematically integrates limited site-specific data with engineering judgment/local experience (i.e., prior knowledge in Bayesian methods) and regression models (relating soil properties to site-specific data, if the soil properties of interest are not measured directly). As the regression model (e.g., a commonly used design chart between standard penetration test (SPT) data N-SPT and phi') is generally not perfect but with some uncertainty, the characterization result would be inevitably affected by the uncertainty in the regression model. Furthermore, the effect of model uncertainty may become more sophisticated, if the magnitude of model uncertainty in regression models (e.g., a N-SPT - phi' design chart) is unknown or difficult to calibrate. This paper aims to explore the effect of model uncertainty on the characterization result, particularly when the magnitude of model uncertainty is unknown (note that determination and quantification of the model uncertainty are not the objective of this study). The effect of model uncertainty can be clearly illustrated by comparing the probabilistic characterization result of phi' considering the unknown model uncertainty in a N-SPT - phi' design chart, and that ignoring the unknown model uncertainty in the N-SPT - phi' design chart. Simulated data is used for such illustration. It is shown that considering the model uncertainty in the design chart achieves more consistent and reliable results than ignoring model uncertainty in the design chart. This would be quite useful when probabilistically estimating soil properties of interest (e.g.,phi') from some other commonly used in-situ tests (e.g., N-SPT).

Representing uncertainty on model analysis plots

Uncertainty-aware Topic Modeling Visualization

Visualizing changes in student responses using consistency plots

Evaluating the Use of Uncertainty Visualisations for Imputations of Data Missing At Random in Scatterplots

Quantifying Model Uncertainties in the Space of Probability Measures

Characterising geotechnical model uncertainty by hybrid Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation

Visualizing Large-Scale Uncertainty in Astrophysical Data

The Observation Range Adjusted Method: A Novel Approach to Accounting for Observation Uncertainty in Model Evaluation

Uncertainty Principles for Teaching Laboratories

Effect of Model Uncertainty on Probabilistic Characterization of Soil Property

Modeling Error Distributions of Growth Curve Models Through Bayesian Methods.

Assessing Bayes Factor Surfaces Using Interactive Visualization and Computer Surrogate Modeling

Uncertainty Analysis in Software Reliability Modeling by Bayesian Analysis with Maximum-Entropy Principle.

Uncertainty-Oriented Ensemble Data Visualization and Exploration using Variable Spatial Spreading

New perspectives on student reasoning about measurement uncertainty: More or better data

An Entropy-Based Test and Development Framework for Uncertainty Modeling in Level-Set Visualizations

Never mind the metrics -- what about the uncertainty? Visualising confusion matrix metric distributions

Quantifying Uncertainty in Transdimensional Markov Chain Monte Carlo Using Discrete Markov Models

Expressing and visualizing model uncertainty in Bayesian variable selection using Cartesian credible sets

Bayesian Surrogate Analysis and Uncertainty Propagation

Representation of probability distributions with implied volatility and biological rationale