Abstract:In this paper, we study the Helmholtz equation by the method of fundamental solutions (MFS) using Bessel and Neumann functions. The bounds of errors are derived for bounded simply-connected domains, while the bounds of condition number are derived only for disk domains. The MFS using Bessel functions is more efficient than the MFS using Neumann functions. Note that by using Bessel functions, the radius R of the source nodes is not necessarily to be larger than the maximal radius r max of the solution domain. This is against the well-known rule: r(max) < R for the MFS. Numerical experiments are carried out, to support the analysis and conclusions made. This is the first novelty in this paper. The error analysis for the Helmholtz equation is more complicated than that for the modified Helmholtz equation in [35], since the Bessel functions J(n)(x) have infinite zeros. We consider the curial and degenerate cases when J(n)(kR) approximate to 0 and J(n)(k rho) approximate to 0. There exist few reports for the analysis for such a degeneracy (e.g., Li [21]). The error bounds are also explored for bounded simply-connected domains. The second novelty of this paper is for the analysis of the MFS in degeneracy. For the MFS using Neumann functions, the rule of the MFS, r(max) < R, must obey. This paper is the first time to discover that the MFS using Bessel and Neumann functions suffer from the spurious eigenvalues. The spurious eigenvalues are not the true eigenvalues of the corresponding eigenvalue problems, but the correct solutions can not be obtained due to either algorithm singularity or divergence of numerical solutions. For the method of particular solutions (MPS) in [26], however, the source nodes disappear. In this paper, we will briefly provide the analysis of the MFS using Neumann functions, and the polynomial convergence can be achieved for bounded simple-connected domains. The analysis of the MFS using Neumann functions and numerical comparisons for different methods are the third contribution in this paper. (C) 2018 IMACS. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Note on the numerical solution of the scalar Helmholtz equation in a nanotorus with uniform Dirichlet boundary conditions

A numerical study of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator in planar domains

Stability estimates of Nyström discretizations of Helmholtz decomposition boundary integral equation formulations for the solution of Navier scattering problems in two dimensions with Dirichlet boundary conditions

Asymptotic behaviors for the eigenvalues of the Schrödinger equation

On the Existence of Helical Invariant Solutions to Steady Navier-Stokes Equations

Characterization of the Eigenvalues and Eigenfunctions of the Helmholtz Newtonian operator N^k

Eigenvalue Analysis of Spherical Resonant Cavity Using Radial Basis Functions

The Helmholtz Dirichlet and Neumann problems on piecewise smooth open curves

Mean Value Properties of Solutions to the Helmholtz and Modified Helmholtz Equations

On relations between harmonic functions and solutions of the modified Helmholtz equation

Numerical Analysis of the Helmholtz Green's Function for Scalar Wave Propagation Through a Nano-hole on a Plasmonic Layer

Vibrations and damping of the eigenmodes of viscoelastic nanospheres with thermal conductivity

Comparable upper and lower bounds for boundary values of Neumann eigenfunctions and tight inclusion of eigenvalues

The Method of Fundamental Solutions for the Helmholtz Equation

Time-harmonic waves in Korteweg and nematic-Korteweg fluids

Series solutions of nano boundary layer flows by means of the homotopy analysis method

A Finite Element Algorithm for High-Lying Eigenvalues and Eigenfunctions with Homogeneous Neumann and Dirichlet Boundary Conditions

Monotone Properties of the Eigenfunction of Neumann Problems

Solution of the Schrodinger equation for quasi-one-dimensional materials using helical waves

Riemann–Hilbert approach and double-polesolutions for the third-order flow equation ofDNLS-type equation with nonzero boundaryconditions

Nodal deficiency, spectral flow, and the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map