Abstract:There hasn't been much exchange of ideas between economists and philosophers of economics. This is understandable to some extent, given that the primary focus of these communities is different. Most economists show little interest in the general and abstract methodological issues that philosophers of economics typically explore, for example, and conversely most philosophers of economics do not seem to be very interested in the practical, 'bread and butter' decisions that pre-occupy economists in their professional practices. But there are exceptions, such as the series of papers Itzhak Gilboa, Andrew Postlewaite, Larry Samuelson, and David Schmeidler (GPSS) have been publishing on how economists think about their own modelling practices (Gilboa et al., Citation 2014 , Citation 2018 , Citation 2019 , Citation 2023 ). These papers for sure fall within the orbit of interest of philosophers of economics. Yet direct and explicit engagement with the work of GPSS by philosophers of economics has been largely missing. When we saw a working paper by GPSS on economic methodology circulating some three years ago, we thought that it would provide a nice opportunity to organize an open exchange with prominent philosophers of economics. Hence, we contacted GPSS to invite them to submit this as a target article for a special issue. Although this working paper was submitted to another journal (Gilboa et al. Citation 2023 ), GPSS kindly offered to write a new article for JEM, outlining their views. After their article was published online, we invited a diverse set of authors with expertise on this topic to provide commentaries. Many of those invited graciously agreed to submit their commentary. While the process, including submission of the articles and peer review, took longer than anticipated, we are proud to present this special issue at the end of 2024.

Can Economics Afford Not To Become Natural Science?

Eco - No(?) - Physics - comments and reflexions -

Monetary economics from econophysics perspective

Economics in the Social Science Spectrum: Evolution and Overlap with Different Academic Areas

Natural Philosophy versus Philosophy of Naturalness

Can an interdisciplinary field contribute to one of the parent disciplines from which it emerged?

"Social science is explanation or it is nothing." Introduction to a debate

Econophysics: Comments on a few Applications, Successes, Methods, & Models

Conservation laws, financial entropy and the Eurozone crisis

Is Life (or at least socio-economic aspects of it) just Spin and Games?

Journals as constituents of scientific discourse: economic heterodoxy

Introduction to the special issue: economic theories and their dueling interpretations

Economics from a biological perspective: the role of sociocultural homeostasis

Does economics need a scientific revolution?

Comments Regarding "On the Nature of Science"

Interdisciplinarity in Socio-economics, mathematical analysis and predictability of complex systems

An introduction to economics as a moral science

From Statistical Physics to Social Sciences: The Pitfalls of Multi-disciplinarity

A Second Discussion on the Use of Scientifical Attitude to Study Marxist Economics

Economics cannot isolate itself from political theory: a mathematical demonstration

Can We Fully Comprehend the Intricacies of the Physical World? Some Reflections on the Boundaries of Scientific Knowledge from a Historical Perspective