Abstract:Teaching assistants (TAs) are often responsible for grading in introductory physics courses at large research universities. Their grading practices can shape students' approaches to problem solving and learning. Physics education research recommends grading practices that encourage students to provide evidence of understanding via explication of the problem-solving process. However, TAs may not necessarily grade in a manner that encourages students to provide evidence of understanding in their solutions. Within the context of a semester-long TA professional development course, we investigated whether encouraging TAs to use a grading rubric that appropriately weights the problem-solving process and having them reflect upon the benefits of using such a rubric prompts TAs to require evidence of understanding in student solutions. We examined how the TAs graded realistic student solutions to introductory physics problems before they were provided a rubric, whether TAs used the rubric as intended, whether they were consistent in grading similar solutions, and how TAs' grading criteria changed after discussing the benefits of a well-designed rubric. We find that many TAs typically applied the rubric consistently when grading similar student solutions but did not require students to provide evidence of understanding. TAs' written responses, class discussions, and individual interviews suggest that the instructional activities involving the grading rubrics in this study were not sufficient to change their grading practices. Interviews and class discussions suggest that helping TAs value a rubric that appropriately weights the problem-solving process may be challenging partly due to the TAs past educational experiences and the departmental context.

Grading Practices and Considerations of Graduate Students at the Beginning of their Teaching Assignment

Physics postgraduate teaching assistants' grading approaches: Conflicting goals and practices

Instructional Goals and Grading Practices of Graduate Students after One Semester of Teaching Experience

Physics graduate teaching assistants' beliefs about a grading rubric: Lessons learned

The challenges of changing teaching assistants' grading practices: Requiring students to show evidence of understanding

Teaching assistants' beliefs regarding example solutions in introductory physics

Rethinking Tools for Training Teaching Assistants

Teaching practices of graduate teaching assistants

Surveying Graduate Students' Attitudes and Approaches to Problem Solving

Enhancing traditional grading in introductory physics courses

Undergraduate perceptions of graduate teaching assistants: Competence, relatedness, and autonomy in practice

Categorization of problems to assess and improve proficiency as teachers and learners

Surveying college introductory physics students' attitudes and approaches to problem solving

Grading by Category: A simple method for providing students with meaningful feedback on exams in large courses

Can an AI-tool grade assignments in an introductory physics course?

Grading Assistance for a Handwritten Thermodynamics Exam using Artificial Intelligence: An Exploratory Study

What contributes to teaching assistant development: differential responses to key design features

Assessing a GTA professional development program

Growing a garden without water: Graduate teaching assistants in introductory science laboratories at a doctoral/research university

Using AI Large Language Models for Grading in Education: A Hands-On Test for Physics

Interactions between teaching assistants and students boost engagement in physics labs