Trade Liberalization, Economic Activity, and Political Violence in the Global South: Evidence from PTAs

Francesco Amodio,Leonardo Baccini,Giorgio Chiovelli,Michele Di Maio

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiae024

2024-03-19

Economic Policy

Abstract:Abstract This paper investigates the impact of agricultural trade liberalization on economic activity and political violence in emerging countries. We use data on all Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs) signed between 25 low- and middle-income countries and their high-income trade partners between 1995 and 2013. We exploit the implied reduction in agricultural tariffs over time combined with variation within countries in their suitability to produce liberalized crops to find that economic activity increases differentially in affected areas. We also find strong positive effects on political violence, and present evidence consistent with both producer- and consumer-side mechanisms: violence increases differentially in more urbanized areas that are suitable to produce less labor-intensive crops as well as crops that are consumed locally. Our estimates imply that economic activity and political violence would have been around 2% and 7% lower, respectively, across countries in our sample had the PTAs not been signed.

economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to explore the impact of agricultural trade liberalization on economic activity and political violence in emerging countries. Specifically, the authors utilize data from all Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs) signed between 25 low- and middle-income countries and high-income trade partners from 1995 to 2013. The study finds that in regions affected by trade liberalization, economic activity increased, but political violence also rose.

The main conclusions include:

1. **Increase in Economic Activity**: In areas suitable for producing liberalized crops, economic activity significantly increased. For example, at the county level, a one standard deviation increase in export exposure leads to a 7% increase in economic activity (measured by nighttime light intensity).
2. **Rise in Political Violence**: Political violence increased by about 4% in the affected areas, particularly in more urbanized counties.
3. **Mechanism Analysis**: This effect is realized through both production and consumption mechanisms. Crops that are less labor-intensive in the production process and those consumed locally are more likely to trigger political violence.
4. **Policy Recommendations**: If these PTAs had not been signed, overall economic activity and political violence in the sample countries would have decreased by approximately 2% and 7%, respectively. Therefore, policymakers need to consider the distributional effects of trade liberalization and take measures to address potential instability, especially in areas where agricultural production is less labor-dependent and the urban population is higher.

In summary, this paper reveals the dual impact of trade liberalization: while it promotes economic growth, the unequal distribution of trade gains may also exacerbate political instability and violence.