Abstract:In the Hippocratic conception, medicine is a synthesis of technique, philosophy and humanism, but in essence it is nothing more than the expression of the living being to counter predestination. Its foundation is the dose–response relationship that a living organism expresses when perturbed by an external agent. In practice, however, this interpretation is defined by the knowledge, thought, economic means, politics and religious sentiment of the community to which the organism belongs. Homeopathy, too, does not escape these considerations. It is a child of the vitalistic philosophy of the time when it was formulated by a giant of human history, Samuel Hahnemann. At that time, knowledge did not allow for the biological definition of disease, but simply the acceptance or rejection of the Hippocratic view of the symptom as an attempt at self-healing. As a therapeutic modality, therefore, homeopathy was formulated by its founder as an intervention aimed at promoting the self-healing of an organism, postulating that this act was defined by the response that the organism engaged to counter an anomaly. Consequently, the therapeutic method had a heuristic nature, independent of any knowledge of the nature of the homeopathic remedy or the biological mechanisms underlying the administration of such a remedy. In fact, the therapy implied a personalized intervention that did not necessarily foresee its definition within a general scheme. These foundations have two unfortunate consequences. The first is that the pursuit of homeopathy involves a self-limiting characteristic, not foreseeing the development of the therapeutic modality. The second is that homeopathy is not easily generalizable, not favoring its uptake in medical practice in places designated for the removal of anomalies in a large number of people, such as in a hospital. But what is more important is the fact that it a priori avoids conceiving a definition of reality, as the scientific method pursues with experiment and reproducibility, assuming as real what is exact and not necessarily what is true. This is the primary reason that causes the potential marginalization of homeopathy, because in a society that bases its evolution on the canons that defined the Scientific Revolution, a therapeutic modality that after two centuries does not strive to justify its foundations, limiting itself to the free subjective interpretation of those who pursued it, questions its own right to existence. Therefore, if Hahnemann promoted a view that was astonishing for its inherent foresight, anticipating many concepts of modern health care, the problem resides in the fact that he was unable to notice the fragility of his own perspective. The founding of experimental medicine by Claude Bernard, the misinterpretation of Pasteur's discoveries and the exaltation of Koch's discoveries rendered Hahnemann's vitalistic conception obsolete. In fact, they promoted the creation of an orthodoxy rooted in the social pact between public institutions and professional orders, defining an official medicine model that entails the adoption of a certain culture and not proven capability. From this, homeopaths were excluded or at most tolerated. Because if "science" was an inadequate word, it was enough to replace it with the locution "demonstration of efficacy", which lent itself better to the interested intervention of some, but which the personalization of the homeopathic method did not allow to justify. Medicine did not consider that by adopting a Cartesian mechanistic model, it justified the absurdity of administering 10 million molecules of a drug per cell of an organism with predictable health damage. But to establish itself, it entrusted pharmacology with the task of establishing an efficacy criterion based on a certain minimum dose of the drug (threshold model), ideologically postulating the non-authentic nature of a methodological approach that envisaged dilutions and the action of infinitesimal doses.[1] [2] Indeed, in postulating the view of the organism as a machine, and valuing the preservation of the structure over maximum function, the disease was attributed to the malfunction of a mechanism, which must be inhibited (or removed). Therefore, the experimental evidence showing the existence of self-healing processes, stimulated by low-dose interference, was consciously disregarded. With this behavior, to affirm itself, biomedicine distorted experimental reality. But this conduct took place because neither the essence of the vital process nor the physiology of biological systems was then known. Their partial elucidation has occurred in the past 80 years. While homeopaths withdrew—as they still do, entrenching themselves in fideistic positions or displaying "bird of the woods" behavior in Hobbesian terms—homeopathy postulated a view similar to the "immobile motor" (unmoved mover) of the Western metaphysica -Abstract Truncated-

HRI London 2023: The Homeopathy Research Community Reunites after a 4-Year Hiatus, Sparking Fresh Collaborations between Researchers 'Old and New'

Insights from a Decade of 'Cutting Edge Research in Homeopathy'

Homeopathy's Enhanced Scope and Recognition

Abstracts of the 19th Annual Conference of the Natural Health Products Research Society of Canada: New Frontiers in NHP Research

The Three Powerful Traditions of Thinking that Constitute Homeopathy

60 Years of the 3Rs symposium: Lessons learned and the road ahead

Highlights from the 25th International Reid Bioanalytical Forum

Preface: 2024 International Conference on Law, History, Philosophy and Public Relations (LHPPR 2024)

EUFOREA summit in Brussels 2023: inspiring the future of allergy & respiratory care

Greetings from the editor 2024/2

Healthcare professionals in research (HPiR) Facebook community: a survey of U.K. doctoral and postdoctoral healthcare professionals outside of medicine

Engaging With Health Consumers in Scientific Conferences—As Partners not Bystanders

Homeopathy at a Turning Point

The Past and the Future of Holocaust Research: From Disparate Sources to an Integrated European Holocaust Research Infrastructure

Centering inclusivity in the design of online conferences—An OHBM–Open Science perspective

The Role of Medical Societies and the Relevance of Clinical Perspective in the Evolving EU HTA Process: Insights Generated at the 2023 Fall Convention and Survey of the European Access Academy

Highlights from the Biocatalysis Faraday Discussion, May 2024, London, United Kingdom

Co‐creating and implementing a novel pre‐conference event to promote equity and inclusivity among academic researchers and people who use drugs

Homöopathie: therapeutische Wirksamkeit und Anwendung in der klinischen Praxis

Eighth Annual Conference of inVIVO Planetary Health: From Challenges to Opportunities