Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome of Children: Subphenotypes, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, Cytokine Profiles, and Viral Sequencing
Roberta L. DeBiasi,Ashraf S. Harahsheh,Hemalatha Srinivasalu,Anita Krishnan,Matthew P. Sharron,Kavita Parikh,Karen Smith,Michael Bell,Drew Michael,Meghan Delaney,Joseph Campos,Eric Vilain,Jonathan LoTempio,Jaclyn N. Kline,Tova Ronis,Suvankar Majumdar,Eleanor Sadler,Susan R. Conway,Charles I. Berul,Sangeeta Sule,Rebeca Lahoz,Emily Ansusinha,Jay Pershad,Vanessa Bundy,Elizabeth Wells,James E. Bost,David Wessel,Children's National Hospital MIS-C Taskforce,Yasser Diab,Jessica Herstek,Sona Sehgal,Hemant Sharma,Andrea Hahn,Nada Harik,Rana Hamdy,Benjamin Hanisch,Barbara Jantausch,Adeline Koay,Bernhard Wiedermann,Alexandra Yonts,Xiaoyan Song,Jennifer Dien Bard
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.06.002
IF: 6.314
2021-10-01
The Journal of Pediatrics
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Objective</h3><p>To assess demographic, clinical, and biomarker features distinguishing patients with Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C); compare MIS-C sub-phenotypes; identify cytokine biosignatures; and characterize viral genome sequences.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Study design</h3><p>We performed a prospective observational cohort study of 124 children hospitalized and treated under the institutional MIS-C Task Force protocol from March-September 2020 at Children's National, a quaternary freestanding Children's Hospital in Washington DC. Of this cohort, 63 of the patients had the diagnosis of MIS-C (39 confirmed, 24 probable) and 61 were from the same cohort of admitted patients who subsequently had an alternative diagnosis (controls).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Median age and sex were similar between MIS-C and controls. Black (46%) and Latino (35%) children were overrepresented in the MIS-C cohort, with Black children at highest risk (OR 4.62, 95% CI 1.151-14.10; <em>P</em> = .007). Cardiac complications were more frequent in critically ill MIS-C (55% vs. 28%; p=0.04) including systolic myocardial dysfunction (39% vs. 3%; p=0.001), and valvular regurgitation (33% vs. 7%; p=0.01). Median cycle threshold (Ct) was 31.8 (27.95--35.1 IQR) in MIS-C cases, significantly higher (indicating lower viral load) than in primary SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cytokines siL2R, IL10, and IL-6 were higher in MIS-C compared with controls. Cytokine analysis revealed sub-phenotype differences between critically ill vs. noncritically ill (IL-2, sIL2R, IL-10, Il-6); PCR positive vs. negative (TNF-α, IL10, IL-6), and presence vs. absence of cardiac abnormalities (IL-17) Phylogenetic analysis of viral genome sequences revealed predominance of GH clade originating in Europe, with no differences comparing MIS-C with primary COVID patients. Treatment was well tolerated, and no children died.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>This study establishes a well-characterized large cohort of MIS-C treated following a standardized protocol and identifies key clinical, biomarker, cytokine, viral load, and sequencing features. Long term follow up will provide opportunity for future insights into MIS-C and its sequelae.</p>
pediatrics