Including the perspective of stakeholders in landscape planning through the Ecosystem Services co-production framework: an empirical exploration in Le Marche, Italy

Giacomelli, Matteo,Sargolini, Massimo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-024-02184-w

IF: 4.704

2024-02-09

Regional Environmental Change

Abstract:Research on Ecosystem Services (ES) has become dominant in landscape planning to frame the relationship between people and nature. Increasingly, studies are stressing that most ES do not flow from nature alone but require a significant human contribution, known as ES co-production. However, there is a lack of understanding on how different stakeholders contribute to ES co-production. Here, we integrated stakeholders' perspectives in landscape planning using questionnaires and focus groups in a case study in Le Marche, Italy. We found that respondents acknowledge co-production in a wide range of ES with a major share of cultural ES. Mostly self-perceived as users and managers, local stakeholders invest in their activities mainly human and social capitals, while physical and financial capitals gain importance in the case of provisioning services. Our findings embraced the multiple aspects of human-nature interactions, offering the opportunity to bridge different sectors, such as agriculture, eco-tourism, and resilience against extreme events, toward a multifunctional vision of landscapes. The integration of the ES co-production framework proved useful in fostering the access of stakeholders to decision-making.

environmental sciences,environmental studies

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to explore how to incorporate stakeholders' perspectives on the co-production framework of Ecosystem Services (ES) in landscape planning. Specifically, the study conducted an empirical investigation in the Marche region of Italy through questionnaires and focus group discussions. The research mainly addressed the following issues:

1. **Stakeholders' ES Perception**:
- The study found that local stakeholders generally recognize the existence of multiple ecosystem services, and most cultural ecosystem services (such as spiritual well-being, sense of place, etc.) are widely acknowledged.

2. **Diversity of Human Contributions**:
- Stakeholders primarily participate in the co-production process of ES through human capital and social capital. For example, education and knowledge (human capital) as well as values and norms (social capital) play significant roles in promoting interactions with natural capital.

3. **Participation of Different Roles**:
- The study distinguished the roles of different stakeholder groups, such as agricultural producers and tourism practitioners who often see themselves as managers, while those in education and research fields more often see themselves as users. These different roles reveal the power relations among stakeholders and their importance to key ES.

4. **Application Value of the Co-production Framework**:
- The paper demonstrated the effectiveness of applying the ES co-production framework in landscape planning, helping to identify the role of ES co-production in different sectors, supporting the realization of multifunctional landscapes, and promoting the formulation of sustainable development strategies.

Through this study, the authors emphasized the importance of integrating the social dimension into environmental assessments, particularly in promoting community roles in landscape management. Additionally, the research indicated that cultural ecosystem services are of significant importance in rural areas and need more attention in planning practices.