Can Combined Screening of Ultrasound and Elastography Improve Breast Cancer Identification Compared with MRI in Women with Dense Breasts-a Multicenter Prospective Study
Lu-Ying Gao,Yang Gu,Wen Xu,Jia-Wei Tian,Li-Xue Yin,Hai-Tao Ran,Wei-Dong Ren,Yu-Ming Mu,Jie-Ying Zhang,Cai Chang,Jian-Jun Yuan,Chun-Song Kang,You-Bin Deng,Hui Wang,Xiao-Yan Xie,Bao-Ming Luo,Sheng-Lan Guo,Qi Zhou,En-Sheng Xue,Wei-Wei Zhan,Tong Jiao,Qing Zhou,Jie Li,Ping Zhou,Pin-Tong Huang,Hong-Yuan Xue,Chun-Quan Zhang,Man Chen,Xiang-Xiang Jing,Ying Gu,Jian-Feng Guo,Hong-Yu Ding,Jin-Feng Xu,Wu Chen,Li Liu,Yu-Hong Zhang,Hong-Qiao Wang,Zhong-Ping Mu,Jian-Chu Li,Hong-Yan Wang,Yu-Xin Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.43326
IF: 3.9
2020-01-01
Journal of Cancer
Abstract:Objectives: To assess the performance of elastography (ES) and ultrasound (US) in predicting the malignancy of breast lesions and to compare their combined diagnostic value with that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: The study prospectively enrolled 242 female patients with dense breasts treated in 35 heath care facilities in China between November 2018 and October 2019. Based on conventional US and elastography, radiologists classified the degree of suspicion of breast lesions according to the US Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) criteria. The diagnostic value was compared between US BI-RADS and MRI BI-RADS, with pathological results used as the reference standard. Results: The results demonstrated that irregular tumor shape, a nonparallel growth orientation, indistinct margins, angular contours, microcalcifications, color Doppler flow and ES score on US imaging were significantly related to breast cancer in dense breasts (P=0.001; P=0.001; P=0.008; P<0.001; P=0.019; P=0.008; P=0.002, respectively). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy and AUC of US BI-RADS category were 94.7%, 90.7%, 95.8%, 88.0%, 93.4% and 0.93 (95%CI, 0.88-0.97), respectively, while those of MRI BI-RADS category were 98.2%, 57.5%, 84.3%, 83.3%, 86.0% and 0.78 (95%CI, 0.71-0.85), respectively. MRI BI-RADS showed a significantly higher sensitivity than US BI-RADS (98.2% vs 94.7%, P=0.043), whereas US BI-RADS showed significantly higher specificity (90.7% vs 57.5%, P<0.001). US BI-RADS showed better diagnostic efficiency in differentiating nodules in dense breasts than MRI BI-RADS (AUC 0.93 vs 0.78, P<0.001). Conclusion: By combining the use of ES and conventional US, US BI-RADS had better diagnostic efficiency in differentiating nodules in dense breasts than MRI. For the diagnosis of malignant tumors in patients with dense breasts, MRI and US BI-RADS can be used as supplemental diagnostic tools to detect lesions, with US BI-RADS considered the preferred adjunctive resource.