Length of Stay Prediction Models for Oral Cancer Surgery: Machine Learning, Statistical and ACS‐NSQIP

Amirpouyan Namavarian,Alexander Gabinet‐Equihua,Yangqing Deng,Shuja Khalid,Hedyeh Ziai,Konrado Deutsch,Jingyue Huang,Ralph W. Gilbert,David P. Goldstein,Christopher M.K.L. Yao,Jonathan C. Irish,Danny J. Enepekides,Kevin M. Higgins,Frank Rudzicz,Antoine Eskander,Wei Xu,John R. de Almeida
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31443
IF: 2.97
2024-04-25
The Laryngoscope
Abstract:Few validated risk prediction models in head and neck cancer exist for length of stay after surgery. Comparison of ACS‐NSQIP calculator, machine learning, and statistical models for length of stay was made. All models were superior to ACS‐NSQIP with fair performance. Machine learning model slightly outperformed all other models. Creatinine, surgery duration, and intraoperative fluid volume were emphasized in predicting length of stay. Objective Accurate prediction of hospital length of stay (LOS) following surgical management of oral cavity cancer (OCC) may be associated with improved patient counseling, hospital resource utilization and cost. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of statistical models, a machine learning (ML) model, and The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program's (ACS‐NSQIP) calculator in predicting LOS following surgery for OCC. Materials and Methods A retrospective multicenter database study was performed at two major academic head and neck cancer centers. Patients with OCC who underwent major free flap reconstructive surgery between January 2008 and June 2019 surgery were selected. Data were pooled and split into training and validation datasets. Statistical and ML models were developed, and performance was evaluated by comparing predicted and actual LOS using correlation coefficient values and percent accuracy. Results Totally 837 patients were selected with mean patient age being 62.5 ± 11.7 [SD] years and 67% being male. The ML model demonstrated the best accuracy (validation correlation 0.48, 4‐day accuracy 70%), compared with the statistical models: multivariate analysis (0.45, 67%) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (0.42, 70%). All were superior to the ACS‐NSQIP calculator's performance (0.23, 59%). Conclusion We developed statistical and ML models that predicted LOS following major free flap reconstructive surgery for OCC. Our models demonstrated superior predictive performance to the ACS‐NSQIP calculator. The ML model identified several novel predictors of LOS. These models must be validated in other institutions before being used in clinical practice. Level of Evidence Level 3 Laryngoscope, 2024
medicine, research & experimental,otorhinolaryngology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?