Design, Synthesis and Anti‐Cancer Evaluation of Quinoline‐1,2,4‐triazine Hybrids

Chang‐E Dong,Cong Qi,Rui‐Li,Xuan‐Yi Xue,Rong‐Bin Wei,Wei‐Wei Liu,Yuan‐Fen Zhai,Da‐Hua Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202400559
2024-09-01
ChemistrySelect
Abstract:Nine quinoline‐1,2,4‐triazine hybrids (5 a–5 i) were designed, synthesized, and evaluated as anti‐cancer agents. Compound 5 a, 5 d and 5 h had studied by single crystal x‐ray diffraction. The study of anti‐proliferative activity against Panc‐1 cells has found that compound 5 g exhibited the best anti‐proliferative activity with IC50 value of 26.8 μM. Nine quinoline‐1,2,4‐triazine hybrids (5 a–5 i) were designed, synthesized, and subjected to evaluation as potential anti‐cancer agents. Structures validation of the synthesized analogues was accomplished through comprehensive analysis employing NMR, HRMS, and IR spectroscopy techniques. Furthermore, the molecular structures of compounds 5 a, 5 d and 5 h were authenticated via single crystal X‐ray diffraction. In an extensive screening process against the human pancreatic cancer PANC‐1 cell line utilizing the MTT assay, all quinoline‐1,2,4‐triazine hybrids (5 a–5 i) manifested significant anti‐proliferative activity. Compound 5 g demonstrated a significant anti‐proliferative effect with an IC50 value of 26.8 μM, similar to the positive control, 5‐Fu. Subsequent investigations revealed varying degrees of cell viability in MDA‐MB‐231, A549, and UM‐UC‐3 cell lines upon exposure to different concentrations of compound 5 g. These findings lead us to postulate that compound 5 g may impede the migration, invasion, and adhesion of PANC‐1 cells, similar to the effects observed with 5‐Fu.
chemistry, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?