EFFECTS OF DEMENTIA-RELATED VISUAL IMPAIRMENT ON ROUTE FOLLOWING IN POSTERIOR CORTICAL ATROPHY AND TYPICAL ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE
Amelia M. Carton,Keir Yong,Biao Yang,Ian McCarthy,Tatsuto Suzuki,Catherine Holloway,Robin Serougne,Derrick Boampong,Mary Pat Sullivan,Nick Tyler,Sebastian J. Crutch
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.461
2016-01-01
Abstract:Dementia-related visual impairment is a common but under-recognised symptom of Alzheimer’s disease and is a leading symptom of Posterior Cortical Atrophy (PCA; a neurodegenerative condition characterised in part by a decline in visuospatial and visuoperceptual skills due to parietal and occipito-temporal atrophy). Corticovisual impairment has multiple negative consequences on both independence and quality of life of people with dementia, for example, increasing risks of falls and/or getting lost in both familiar and unfamiliar environments. This study explores the effect of dementia-related visual impairment on route following in PCA and typical Alzheimer’s disease (tAD) and investigates under what conditions any problems with route following can be minimised. Eleven PCA patients, 10 tAD patients and 13 healthy controls visited the Pedestrian Accessibility Movement Environment Laboratory (PAMELA), a simulated and controlled real-world environment in which participants were required to walk down closed corridors (24 trials). These corridors varied according to contour (straight; u-shaped; s-shaped), dynamic visual cue (present, absent), lighting level (low: 20 lux; high: 190 lux) and route direction (forward, backward). Our primary measure of performance was task time. Movements of the pelvis and of each foot were recorded using wireless inertial measurement units (Xsens MTw), from which location was also extracted using dead-reckoning analysis. SMI eye-tracking glasses were worn to record fixation duration and location. Both patient groups demonstrated poorer performance compared to controls overall. As route complexity increased, poor performance in patient groups was emphasised relative to controls. PCA patients exhibited the worst performance for more complex routes, followed by tAD patients. Additionally, a subgroup of participants in both patient groups demonstrated profound spatial disorientation within these routes. Overall fixation position in PCA patients was lower than that in control participants, presumably as a consequence of visual impairment. We explore patterns of performance and predictors of hesitation during route following in relation to gait, eye-tracking and neuropsychological measures. Results indicate that not only PCA but also tAD patients experience problems with spatial navigation even when following a closed route within a simplified environment. Detailed gait and location analysis provide insights into the complex interplay between environmental and patient characteristics. Diagram illustrating the three different route conditions: a) straight route; b) U-shaped route; c) S-shaped route, when route direction is 'forward'. Walking paths for control, tAD and PCA groups for U-shaped route, low lighting, cue absent, walking clockwise from starting point (location: x=0, y=0). Circles indicate particularly long step times relative to the control group (>control step time mean + 3SD), with increased circle area corresponding to increased step time.