Vitamin C and Illness

S. Barrett
Abstract:Recendy Stephen Barrett claimed that vitamin C supplementation at best only slightly affects the symptoms of the common cold (SI, January-February). Barrett referred to the large-scale studies carried out by Anderson et al. but extracted no actual data from their reports. In their first study, Anderson et al. found that vitamin C supplementation (1-4 g/day) decreased the "numbers of days confined to house" per subject by 48 percent in subjects with a low dietary intake of fruit juices (1). Barretts claim that at best there is only a slight reduction in symptoms appears grossly misleading considering the published results (1-4). Unlike Barrett, I have written scientific papers analyzing the effect of vitamin C on the common cold (2-5), and my conclusions are quite different from his. Pauling complained that many of his critics had not read either his texts or the original reports, and gave several detailed examples to support his case (6). Apparendy many critics have thought that their main task is to educate the general public on the silliness of vitamin C supplementation, but not to inform themselves about the hard science on the topic.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?