Abstract:Fourteen pairs of twins were selected on the basis of their high scores on The Exceptional Experiences Questionnaire (EEQ ), which documents the frequency and intensity of telepathic and synchronistic experiences amongst twins. The twins alternated in the role of sender in which they were exposed to a surprise or shock stimulus and in the role of receiver in which their electrodermal activity (EDA) was monitored. Sender and receiver were placed in laboratory rooms at remote ends of a building separated by distance and barriers ensuring sensory isolation. Twins in the role of sender were presented with a series of surprise or shock stimuli during the period randomly selected for presentation. This was one out of the 8 periods occurring in the block of 5 minutes. Within the selected period, the actual presentation lasted 30 seconds and occurred at approximately the midpoint of the period. The stimulus presentation in this block of 5 minutes was repeated 5 times making thereby a 25-minute session for each twin belonging to the sender-receiver pair. During this session, the other twin in the role of receiver, had been equipped with electrodes recording EDA and otherwise advised to relax during the session. The task for the judge in the studies was to use the electrophysiological data from the non-shocked twin to identify the exact periods when the stimuli had been exposed to the sending twin. The EDA from 91 useable presentations were displayed and analysed for the purpose of locating any peak EDA response in each of the possible eight periods corresponding to the stimuli exposure times. Correct identifications would thus occur by chance one in eight times. The attempts at these identifications were carried out by GB, a researcher experienced at EDA interpretation but blind as to the periods that had been chosen for the stimulus exposure. The findings from the three experimental studies showed there were 18 correct identifications out of the total 91 stimulus exposures (MCE = 11.4), which reached statistical significance on a one-tailed t-test ( p = .043), and with a binomial test ( p = .03, one-tailed). However, only one of the three studies reached significance, in this case at the same level as the collective results ( p = .043, one-tailed). Two explanations for this are the observed variability in the task-performances of the pairs of twins and in the differences in the sources of the twins for each of the studies. The results of a questionnaire entitled ' Experiences in Close Relationships' (ECR), adapted for twin relationships to assess their degree of attachment, indicated that those twins with many "correct identifications of epochs from the EDA" were not significantly different from the others on this measure of attachment. However, it should be noted that the twins here according to the ECR all had close emotional relationships to each other, thereby giving too little variation to adequately test the hypotheses concerning the role of attachment. The data provides justification for carrying out further studies using this methodology and furthermore that pairs of twins should be used with greater variation in attachment measures. The results are briefly discussed in the context of recent findings concerning the neuropsychology of experiences of synchronicity.

Gut feelings, intuition, and emotions: an exploratory study

Discrete Emotions Discovered by Contactless Measurement of Facial Blood Flows

The Resting-State Electroencephalogram Microstate Correlations With Empathy and Their Moderating Effect on the Relationship Between Empathy and Disgust

Affective interoceptive inference: Evidence from heart‐beat evoked brain potentials

Ingestible pills reveal gastric correlates of emotions

Empathy, Einfühlung, and aesthetic experience: the effect of emotion contagion on appreciation of representational and abstract art using fEMG and SCR

Empathy in Negative and Positive Interpersonal Interactions. What is the Relationship Between Central (EEG, fNIRS) and Peripheral (Autonomic) Neurophysiological Responses?

Gut markers of bodily self-consciousness

EEG Connectivity during Active Emotional Musical Performance

Interoception across Modalities: On the Relationship between Cardiac Awareness and the Sensitivity for Gastric Functions

Facial EMG sensing for monitoring affect using a wearable device

Effects of Aesthetic Chills on a Cardiac Signature of Emotionality

Individual Differences in Negative Emotion Differentiation Predict Resting-State Spontaneous Emotional Regulatory Processes

Effects of Imagery as Visual Stimuli on the Physiological and Emotional Responses

Empathic Responses to Others’ Gains and Losses: an Electrophysiological Investigation

Comparative Assessment of Physiological Responses to Emotional Elicitation by Auditory and Visual Stimuli

Brain Structure and Response to Emotional Stimuli as Related to Gut Microbial Profiles in Healthy Women

EEG Microstates and Fnirs Metrics Reveal the Spatiotemporal Joint Neural Processing Features of Human Emotions

An Experiment With Three Studies Of Physiological Connectedness Amongst Twins And Its Possible Relationship To Attachment

Facial EMG Correlates of Subjective Hedonic Responses During Food Consumption

Linking brain–heart interactions to emotional arousal in immersive virtual reality