Abstract:Introduction: Hemorrhage is responsible for 91% of preventable prehospital deaths in combat. Bleeding from anatomic junctions such as the groin, neck, and axillae make up 19% of these deaths, and reports estimate that effective control of junctional hemorrhage could have prevented 5% of fatalities in Afghanistan. Hemostatic dressings are effective but are time-consuming to apply and are limited when proper packing and manual pressure are not feasible, such as during care under fire. CounterFlow-Gauze is a hemostatic dressing that is effective without compression and delivers thrombin and tranexamic acid into wounds. Here, an advanced prototype of CounterFlow-Gauze, containing a range of low thrombin doses, was tested in a lethal swine model of junctional hemorrhage. Outcomes were compared with those of Combat Gauze, the current dressing recommended by Tactical Combat Casualty Care. Materials and methods: CounterFlow-Gauze containing thrombin doses of 0, 20, 200, and 500 IU was prepared. Swine received femoral arteriotomies, and CounterFlow-Gauze was packed into wounds without additional manual compression. In a separate study using a similar model of junctional hemorrhage without additional compression, CounterFlow-Gauze containing 500 IU thrombin was tested and compared with Combat Gauze. In both studies, the primary outcomes were survival to 3 h and volume of blood loss. Results: CounterFlow-Gauze with 200 and 500 IU had the highest 3-h survival, achieving 70 and 75% survival, respectively. CounterFlow-Gauze resulted in mean peak plasma tranexamic acid concentrations of 9.6 ± 1.0 µg/mL (mean ± SEM) within 3 h. In a separate study with smaller injury, CounterFlow-Gauze with 500 IU achieved 100% survival to 3 h compared with 92% in Combat Gauze animals. Conclusions: An advanced preclinical prototype of CounterFlow-Gauze formulated with a minimized thrombin dose is highly effective at managing junctional hemorrhage without compression. These results demonstrate that CounterFlow-Gauze could be developed into a feasible alternative to Combat Gauze for hemorrhage control on the battlefield.

Hemorrhage control in the battlefield: role of new hemostatic agents

Hemorrhage Control: Lessons Learned From the Battlefield Use of Hemostatic Agents That Can Be Applied in a Hospital Setting

Prehospital Application of Hemostatic Agents in Iraq and Afghanistan

Emerging hemostatic materials for non-compressible hemorrhage control

Polymeric Materials for Hemostatic Wound Healing

Biomaterials and Advanced Technologies for Hemostatic Management of Bleeding

Hemostats in the clinic

[Surgical management of severe noncompressible torso and organ hemorrhages]

How I manage major hemorrhage

Current status of hemostatic agents, their mechanism of action, and future directions

Effective approaches to address noncompressible torso hemorrhage

A narrative review of prehospital hemorrhagic shock treatment with non-blood product medications

Thirty consecutive uses of a hemostatic bandage at a US Army combat support hospital and forward surgical team in Operation Iraqi Freedom

Emerging materials for hemostasis

Lessons from the tip of the spear: medical advancements from Iraq and Afghanistan

The thin red line: Blood planning factors and the enduring need for a robust military blood system to support combat operations

External Hemorrhage Control Techniques for Human Space Exploration: Lessons from the Battlefield

An alternative hemostatic dressing: comparison of CELOX, HemCon, and QuikClot

Hemostatic materials in wound care

Ruggedized Self-Propelling Hemostatic Gauze Delivers Low Dose of Thrombin and Systemic Tranexamic Acid and Achieves High Survival in Swine With Junctional Hemorrhage

Emergency Blood Transfusion for Trauma and Perioperative Resuscitation: Standard of Care