Polysomnography in children scheduled for adenotonsillectomy

Robert A Weatherly,Deborah L Ruzicka,Deanna J Marriott,Ronald D Chervin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2004.06.699

Abstract:Objective: Several studies suggest that a reliable diagnosis of childhood sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) requires polysomnography (PSG). We compared clinical and PSG-based diagnoses in children scheduled for adenotonsillectomy (AT). Parent responses on a validated Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire were used to determine which symptoms could help identify children with clinical diagnoses of SDB but normal PSG. Study design and setting: Thirty-four children aged 5.0 to 12.9 years and scheduled for AT to treat clinically diagnosed sleep-disordered breathing underwent laboratory-based PSG. Results were scored by 3 different criteria: 1) >1 obstructive apnea (2 breaths or longer) per hour of sleep; 2) >5 apneas or hypopneas per hour of sleep; or 3) >1 apnea, hypopnea, or respiratory event-related arousal per hour of sleep. Results: Depending on the criterion used, the PSG documented SDB from a minimum of 18/34 subjects (53%, for criterion I) to as many as 30/34 subjects (88%, for criterion III). Among symptoms studied, absence of daytime mouth breathing and habitual snoring were most helpful in identification of children who had no evidence of SDB on PSG, by criterion I (Chi-square, P < 0.05). The absence of other common symptoms, such as "loud snoring" or "trouble breathing" at night, were not helpful. Conclusion: Children with clinical diagnoses of SDB may not consistently meet PSG criteria for this disorder. Questions about daytime mouth breathing and habitual snoring might help clinicians recognize children who would not have SDB on objective testing. Significance: Clinical identification of SDB confirmable on PSG could be improved. However, available outcome data do not yet clarify whether clinical or PSG criteria best identify children likely to suffer morbidity from SDB. Ebm rating: C.