Abstract:Background: Early results have illustrated the multiportal robotic approach to be safe and oncologically efficacious in the treatment of thoracic malignancies. Industry leaders have improved upon the lessons learned during the early multiportal studies and have now come to establish the feasibility of the biportal, and subsequently the uniportal robotic-assisted approach, all in an effort to offer patients equivalent or better outcomes with less surgical trauma. No current, coherent body of evidence currently exists outlining the early-term outcomes of patients undergoing uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to clarify the early-phase outcomes of these patients. Methods: An electronic search of four databases was performed to identify relevant studies outlining the immediate post-operative outcomes of patients undergoing uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgeries. The primary endpoint was defined as technical success (i.e., no conversion to secondary robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic, or open approaches). Secondary endpoints of interest included post-operative outcomes and complication rates. A meta-analysis using a random effects model of proportions or means was applied, as appropriate. Results: The search strategy ultimately yielded 12 relevant studies for inclusion. A total of 240 patients (52% male) split across cohort studies and case reports were identified. The mean age of the two groups was 59.7±3.0 and 58.1±6.8 years, respectively. The mean operative time was 133.8±38.2 and 150.0±52.2 minutes, respectively. Length of hospital stay was 4.4±1.6 and 4.3±1.1 days, respectively. The mean blood loss was 80.0±25.1 mL The majority of identified procedures were lobectomies, segmentectomies, and wedge resections, though complex sleeve resections and anterior mediastinal mass resections were also completed. Cumulative technical success was 99.9%. Conclusions: The uniportal robotic-assisted approach, when completed in expert hands, has been illustrated to have exceedingly low rates of conversion to secondary procedures, along with short length of stay (LOS), minimal blood loss, and short procedural times (variable depending on operation type). Current evidence on the feasibility of this approach will be bolstered by upcoming multi-institutional series.

Feasibility and safety of uniport robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in initial series of anatomical pulmonary resections under learning curve

Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Minor Procedures

Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery: Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Hybrid uniportal robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery staplers: technical aspects and results

Subcostal uniportal robotic anatomic lung resection: A pilot trial

Early outcomes of robotic versus uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: a propensity score-matched study

Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for complicated pulmonary resections.

Approaches and outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) for lung cancer: a narrative review

Learning curve for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy

Safety and feasibility of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Safety and perioperative outcomes of uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

The Application of Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Anatomical Segmentectomy for Lung Resection: A Retrospective Clinical Study

Uniportal Video-Assisted Anatomical Segmentectomy: an Analysis of the Learning Curve

Uniportal Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: Primary Experience from an Eastern Center.

The perioperative outcomes of uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgeries-a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical cohort studies and case reports

Decreased postoperative complications, neuropathic pain and epidural anesthesia-free effect of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection: a single-center initial experience of 100 cases

Comparison of Early Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes after Multiportal Robotic-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Anatomic Lung Resection after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Lung Cancer: A Case-Matched Analysis

Efficacy of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of pulmonary sequestration in children

Long-Term And Short-Term Outcomes Of Robot- Versus Video-Assisted Anatomic Lung Resection In Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer