Abstract:Data sourcesStudies were selected, using appropriate key words, from the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; Medline (via Pubmed); Scopus/Elsevier; and Embase. A manual search was also conducted of five periodontology and oral and maxillofacial surgery journals. It was not clarified what proportion of studies included were derived from which source.Study selectionInclusion criteria included prospective studies and randomised controlled trials published in English, with a minimum 6-month follow-up reporting on parameters of periodontal healing distal to the mandibular second molar following removal of M3M in human subjects. These parameters included pocket probing depth (PPD) reduction and final depth (FD), clinical attachment loss (CAL) reduction and FD, alveolar bone defect (ABD) change and FD. Given prognostic indictors and interventions were investigated, the studies were screened using PICO and PECO (Population, Intervention, Exposure, Comparison, Outcome). Cohen’s kappa statistic measured the level of agreement between 2 selecting authors (0.96 stage 1 screening, 1.00 stage 2 screening). Disagreements were resolved with a tie-breaker 3rd author. Ultimately, from 918 studies, 17 met the inclusion criteria and 14 were included in the meta-analysis. Studies were excluded on the basis of same patient pools, non-representative outcomes of interest, insufficient follow-up period, and unclear results.Data extraction and synthesisThe 17 studies meeting the inclusion criteria underwent validity assessment and data extraction, including risk of bias analysis. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate mean difference and standard error for each outcome measure. If these were unavailable, a correlation coefficient was calculated. Meta-regression was used on different subgroups to determine factors affecting periodontal healing. For all analyses, statistical significance was determined as p < 0.05. Statistical variability in outcomes beyond the expected was estimated using I2 analyses, with a value >50% indicating significant heterogeneity.ResultsThe periodontal parameters investigated yielded the following results after meta-analysis: overall PPD reduction of 1.06 mm at 6 months and 1.67 mm at 12 months; final PPD of 3.81 mm at 6 months; CAL change of 0.69 mm at 6 months; final CAL of 4.28 mm at 6 months and 4.37 mm at 12 months; ABD reduction of 2.62 mm at 6 months; ABD of 3.2 mm at 6 months. The authors found no statistically significant effect on periodontal healing from the following confounding factors: age; M3M angulation (specifically, mesioangular impaction); optimisation of periodontal health prior to surgery; scaling and root planing of the distal second molar at the time of surgery; post-operative antibiotics or chlorhexidine prophylaxis. There were statistically significant correlations between baseline PPD and final PPD. There was improved PPD reduction at 6 months with a three-sided flap compared to others, and regenerative materials and bone grafts improved all periodontal parameters.ConclusionsAlthough M3M removal results in modest improvement in periodontal health distally of the second mandibular molar, periodontal defects remain onwards of 6 months. There is limited evidence suggesting a three-sided flap is more beneficial than an envelope flap in PPD reduction at 6 months. Regenerative materials and bone grafts result in significant improvements across all periodontal health parameters. The most important predictive factor in final PPD of the distal second mandibular molar is baseline PPD.

Management of mandibular third molar extraction sites to prevent periodontal defects

Periodontal Regenerative Therapy for Preventing Bone Defects Distal to Mandibular Second Molars After Surgical Removal of Impacted Third Molars: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Modified alveolar ridge preservation to promote the osteogenesis of the distal surface of second molar after mandibular impacted third molar extraction: a preliminary study

Treatment of Osseous Defects after Mandibular Third Molar Removal with a Resorbable Alloplastic Grafting Material: A Case Series with 1- to 2-Year Follow-Up

Autogenous bone grafting for treatment of osseous defect after impacted mandibular third molar extraction: A randomized controlled trial

Treatment of intrabony defects after impacted mandibular third molar removal with bioabsorbable and non-resorbable membranes

The effect of regenerative periodontal therapy in preventing periodontal defects after the extraction of third molars: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Effect modifiers influencing the periodontal healing of the adjacent second molar following mandibular third molar removal

Use of lincomycin-impregnated demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in the periodontal defect after third molar surgery

Comparison of immediate vs. delayed guided tissue regeneration in Infrabony defect of second molars after adjacent third molar extraction: a retrospective study

Periodontal status of mandibular second molar after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars- a prospective clinical trial

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of xenograft to prevent periodontal defects after mandibular third molar extraction

The use of autogenous tooth bone graft powder in the treatment of osseous defects after impacted mandibular third molar extraction: a prospective split-mouth clinical pilot study

Comparison of Dentine Graft and Plasma Rich Fibrin in Bony Defects Following Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: Protocol for a Split-mouth Study

Spontaneous bone regeneration after surgical extraction of a horizontally impacted mandibular third molar: a retrospective panoramic radiograph analysis

The use of enamel matrix derivative alone versus in combination with bone grafts to treat patients with periodontal intrabony defects: a meta-analysis.

Mandibular second molar periodontal healing after impacted third molar extraction in young adults

[Application of β-TCP for bone defect restore after the mandibular third molars extraction: A splitmouth clinical trial]

Autologous Dentin Graft after Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Extraction to Prevent Periodontal Pocket Formation—A Split-Mouth Pilot Study

Influence of Grafting on Pocket Depth and Dentin Hypersensitivity Around Third Molar Extraction Sites: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial

The incidence of periodontal defects distal to the maxillary second molar after impacted third molar extraction