Abstract:This article analyzes differences in displacement of ANS and of the upper first molar when different vectors of force are delivered to the maxilla in non-full-banded Phase I mixed-dentition treatment of Class II malocclusion. The sample is identical to that for which we have previously reported differences in change in several key measures of mandibular and facial shape. It includes a cervical-traction group, a high-pull-to-upper-molar group, a modified-activator group, and an untreated Class II control group. Using newly developed computer-conducted procedures, which are described, we have been able to partition the orthodontic and orthopedic components of upper molar displacement and also to isolate treatment effects from those attributable to spontaneous growth and development. In the region of ANS, small but statistically significant and clinically meaningful differences were noted between treatments. When the intercurrent effects of growth and development had been factored out (Table III), orthopedic distal displacement of ANS was significantly greater in the high-pull and cervical groups than in the activator group. Orthopedic downward displacement of ANS was seen to be significantly greater in the cervical group than in the high-pull and activator groups. In the region of the first molar cusp, mean distal displacement of the tooth as an orthopedic effect was found to be almost identical in the cervical and high-pull groups (although variability was greater in the cervical group), but the mean orthodontic effect was significantly greater in the high-pull group than in the cervical group. In the cervical group, where relatively light forces were used for relatively long treatment periods on average, more of the total distal displacement of the upper molar was of an orthopedic character than of an orthodontic character. Conversely, in the high-pull group, in which relatively heavier forces tended to be used for briefer treatment periods, most of the distal displacement at the upper molar was of an orthodontic character. These observations are contrary to expectations from conventional orthodontic theory. In the activator-treated group, roughly equal components of the treatment-associated distal displacement of the upper molar were of the orthodontic and orthopedic types. As concerns changes in the vertical direction in the region of the molar cusp, significant intrusion of both the orthopedic and orthodontic types was seen in the high-pull sample as compared to each of the other groups examined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The effect of cervical headgear on patients with high or low mandibular plane angles and the "myth" of posterior mandibular rotation

Clinical Efficacy of Counterclockwise Rotating the Functional Occlusal Plane Using Micro-Implant Anchorage.

Changes in mandibular growth direction during and after cervical headgear treatment

Effects of the cervical headgear in growing Angle Class II malocclusion patients: a prospective study

Dental and orthopedic effects of high-pull headgear in treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion

Cephalometric evaluation of changes in vertical dimension and molar position in adult non-extraction treatment with clear aligners and traditional fixed appliances

THE CHANGES OF MANDIBULAR ROTATION AND LOWER ANTERIOR FACIAL HEIGHT IN DENTOSKELETAL ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT WITH MALOCCLUSION CLASS II/1 ANGLE

A retrospective cephalometric investigation of two fixed functional orthodontic appliances in class II treatment: Functional Mandibular Advancer vs. Herbst appliance

Treatment Effects of Simple Fixed Appliance and Reverse Headgear in Correction of Anterior Crossbites

Comparison of the dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes with the cervical headgear and Jones Jig followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study

Quantitative analysis of the orthodontic and orthopedic effects of maxillary traction

Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients

Mandibular growth direction with conventional Class II nonextraction treatment

Dentoskeletal effects of functional appliances vs bimaxillary surgery in hyperdivergent Class II patients

Evaluation of natural head position changes in the treatment of class II malocclusions with functional appliance

Treatment of Class II high angle malocclusions with the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric investigation

Three-dimensional cone-beam computed technology evaluation of skeletal and dental changes in growing patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the cervical pull face-bow headgear appliance

Outcome differences after orthodontic camouflage treatment in hypo- and hyperdivergent patients - A retrospective cephalometric investigation

Occlusal plane rotation and orthodontic decompensation: influence on the outcome of surgical correction of class III malocclusion

The effect of an anterior biteplate on dental and skeletal Class II correction using headgears: a cephalometric study

[Influence on the condyle position by decreasing posterior occlusal plane angle in Class II high angle cases].