Surgery in 1900
Ġ. Turner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4644.73
1950-01-07
British Medical Journal
Abstract:It is natural for anyone with long experience of our profession to reflect on the changes in pathological theory as the years go on. In the early part of the century " autointoxication " and " uric acid poisoning " were all the vogue, with resulting abuse of " intestinal antiseptics " (does anyone ever prescribe them now ?) and "uric acid solvents." Now it is the turn of "allergy," "avitaminosis," and "endocrine imbalance," with the consequent indiscriminate use of antihistamine preparations, vitamins, and hormones. The conception of psychosomatic medicine was not formulated in 1900, and the psychologist was a rare bird outside the asylum. If the practice of our profession was more interesting and adventurous fifty years ago it was not less arduous. I am always inclined to be sceptical when people talk of the " strain of modern life" as explaining the increase of certain diseases-coronary occlusion, for example. As a matter of fact, the doctor of 1900 had in many ways a more exhausting life than his successor of to-day. The motor-car had hardly come in. A surgeon would dash up to the hospital in a barouche and pair, having perhaps lunched off a few sandwiches on his way from the West End; a physician would alight from a one-horse brougham, whilst the assistant staff came by foot, bus, Underground (there were as yet no " tubes "), or-on rare occasions-by hansom. Few kept a secretary. Letters were written by hand, mostly in the evening, and eminent members of the profession could often be seen taking them out to post at midnight, for in those days letters were collected late. All this was rather wearing, especially as week-ends had hardly begun; but, on the other hand, most consultants lived " over the shop" and were spared the strain of the double life of St. John's Wood and Wimpole Street. The Cavendish Square district was then really residential, each house, even in the Square itself, containing its family and retinVe of servants. It was rare to find more than one brass plate on a door. Certainly the sight, now so common, of a covey of plates, a quarter of them bearing foreign names, was then unknown. In keeping with this more dignified living there was more seemliness of dress. The silk hat and frock-coat were de rigueur. And a very comfortable uniform it was. I remember in the hot summer of 1911 going so attired to a consultation at Greenwich when the temperature reached a record of 1000 in the shade. Nor did I feel much incommoded. Whether consultants were better paid on the whole then than they are now it is difficult to say, especially since the muddle introduced by the N.H.S. Juniors certainly were much exploited. House-men usually got no pay at all, and registrars had to work very long hours for a mere pittance. In established consulting work the fee for a first consultation was two -guineas (it was not long since it had been only one), and for a "domiciliary" consultation, within four miles of Charing Cross, three guineas. These figures went up after the first war to three and five respectively. "Country journeys," however, were probably over-paid (two-thirds of the mileage in guineas)-a relic of the days when one travelled by coach. They were also much more frequent than they are to-day, for fifty years ago there were few recognized consultants outside London except in the really large cities. It must also be remembered that in those days there were no devalued pound notes. The sovereign was supreme and worth fully twenty shillings. Living also was extraordinarily cheap and taxation light. Take it all in all, the Edwardian era was certainly the Golden Age of consolting practice. It is improbable that anything like it will ever return. SURGERY IN 1900