Abstract:Objectives To evaluate the mid-term clinical and echocardiographic:outcomes of tricuspid valve plasty(TVP), to compare the curative effect of different tricuspid annuloplasty techniques,and to identify the risk factors of postoperative residual tricuspid regurgitation(PRTR).Methods From August 2005 to February 2007,222 patients underwent tricuspid annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation(FTR) in the Department of Cardiac Surgery of Zhongshan Hospital,Fudan University. Male 89 cases(40.1%),female 133 cases(59.9%),aged(50.0±12.0) years,using 2 main techniques:non-ring procedure in 136 patients(61.3%),and ring procedure in 86 patients(38.7%).Postoperative follow-ups were performed using echocardiography and New York Heart Association(NYHA) classification.Mid-term outcomes of TVP was analyzed.The determinants of PRTR were identified,and the curative effect of different tricuspid annuloplasty techniques was compared,by means of clinical and echocardiographic follow-ups.Results There were 2 perioperative death(0.9%),with no diffrerence between two groups(P= 0.588). Mean follow-up time was(24.4±10.9) months(15 days to 42 months),and 20 cases(9.0%) lost to follow-up.Mean preoperative TR grade was(2.5±1.1) +,and mean postoperative TR grade was(0.7±0.8) +(P< 0.01).Mean preoperative NYHA was 3.1±0.5,and mean postoperative NYHA was 1.4±0.5(P< 0.01).PRTR occurred in 27 cases(13.5%).Tricuspid reoperation rate was 0%,and survival rate was 97.5%.The severity of preoperative TR was higher in ring group(P< 0.01),and the severity of postoperative TR was similar(P=0.269).In patients with preoperative TR 3+ to 4+,the severity of postoperative TR in ring group was lower than non-ring group(P=0.044). The change rate of TR was higher in ring group(P=0.021).When preoperative atrial fibrillation(P=0.001),leftatrium(LA) > 60 mm(P=0.011), systolic pulmonary artery pressure(sPAP) > 65 mmHg(P=0.036) or TR 3+ to 4+(P=0.047),ring group shared higher change rate of TR than non-ring group.In multivariate analysis,rheumatic etiology(P=0.026,OR = 9.9),postoperative right atrium size(P=0.003,OR =2.9),less postoperative left ventri cular ejection fraction(LVEF)(P=0.025,OR= 4.4),postoperative sPAP>50 mmHg(P=0.029,OR =4.2),and higher postoperative sPAP(P=0.020,OR= 4.9) were independent risk factors of PRTR.Conclusions TVP is an effective procedure treating FTR.The echocardiographic mid-term outcome in ring group is better than that in non-ring group,especially when preoperative TR 3+ to 4+,or when preoperative atrial fibrillation,huge LA or pulmonary artery hypertension.Rheumatic etiology,postoperative right atrium size,less postoperative LVEF,postoperative pulmonary artery hypertension and higher postoperative sPAP show independent association with PRTR.

A one-year comparison of prophylactic donor tricuspid annuloplasty in heart transplantation

Three-year Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis.

Effect of novel bicaval anastomosis technique for transplantation with and without prior cardiac surgery history

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Vs. Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis among Patients at Low Surgical Risk in China: from the Multicenter National NTCVR Database

Concomitant Tricuspid Valve Ring Annuloplasty During Mitral Valve Surgery Versus Mitral Valve Surgery Alone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Tricuspid Regurgitation in a Patient with Heart Transplant: Percutaneous Management

Significance of Effective Height and Mechanism of Regurgitation in Tricuspid Aortic Valve Repair

Abstract 13931: Comparison of Inpatient Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis: An Insight From National Inpatient Sample

Transcatheter bicaval valve system for the treatment of severe isolated tricuspid regurgitation. Features from a single-Centre experience

Impact of the operative technique on mid‐ and long‐term results following paediatric heart transplantation

Biomechanical performance of the Bicaval Transcatheter System for the treatment of severe tricuspid regurgitation

The impact of a bicuspid pulmonary valve in the aortic position after arterial switch for transposition of the great arteries on neoaortic root dimension and function: a propensity score matched analysis

Concomitant tricuspid valve surgery in patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Comparison of outcomes between transcatheter tricuspid valve repair and surgical tricuspid valve replacement or repair in patients with tricuspid insufficiency

'Tri'Ing to Clip the Gap: Percutaneous Tricuspid Intervention in a Heart Transplant

Late follow-up for a randomized trial of surgical treatment of tricuspid valve regurgitation in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation

Comparison of Transcatheter versus Surgical Tricuspid Repair among Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation: Two-Year Results

Isolated Reoperation for Tricuspid Regurgitation after Left-Sided Valve Surgery: Technique Evolution

Comparison of waitlist and post‐transplant outcomes in patients supported with total artificial heart versus continuous biventricular assist devices

Determinants of mid-term outcomes of tricuspid annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation:an echocardiography study

Risk of Pacemaker Implantation After Degenerative Mitral and Concomitant Tricuspid Valve Surgery