Abstract:Radiation and potential risk during medical imaging is one of the foremost issues for the imaging community. Because of this, there are growing demands for accountability, including appropriate use of ionizing radiation in diagnostic and image-guided procedures. Factors contributing to this include increasing use of medical imaging; increased scrutiny (from awareness to alarm) by patients/caregivers and the public over radiation risk; and mounting calls for accountability from regulatory, accrediting, healthcare coverage (e.g., Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services), and advisory agencies and organizations as well as industry (e.g., NEMA XR-29, Standard Attributes on CT Equipment Related to Dose Optimization and Management). Current challenges include debates over uncertainty with risks with low-level radiation; lack of fully developed and targeted products for diagnostic imaging and radiation dose monitoring; lack of resources for and clarity surrounding dose monitoring programs; inconsistencies across and between practices for design, implementation and audit of dose monitoring programs; lack of interdisciplinary programs for radiation protection of patients; potential shortages in personnel for these and other consensus efforts; and training concerns as well as inconsistencies for competencies throughout medical providers' careers for radiation protection of patients. Medical care providers are currently in a purgatory between quality- and value-based imaging paradigms, a state that has yet to mature to reward this move to quality-based performance. There are also deficits in radiation expertise personnel in medicine. For example, health physics academic programs and graduates have recently declined, and medical physics residency openings are currently at a third of the number of graduates. However, leveraging solutions to the medical needs will require money and resources, beyond personnel alone. Energy and capital will need to be directed to:• innovative and cooperative cross-disciplinary institutional/practice oversight of and guidance for the use of diagnostic imaging (e.g., radiology, surgical specialties, cardiologists, and intensivists);• initiatives providing practical benchmarks (e.g., dose index registries);• comprehensive (consisting of access, integrity, metrology, analytics, informatics) and effective and efficient dose monitoring programs;• collaboration with industry;• improved use of imaging, such as through decision support combined with evidence-based appropriateness for imaging use;• integration with e-health such as medical records;• education, including information extending beyond the medical imaging community that is relevant to patients, public, and providers and administration;• identification of opportunities for alignment with salient media and advocacy organizations to deliver balanced information regarding medical radiation and risk;• open lines of communication between medical radiation experts and appropriate bodies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the Joint Commission to assure appropriate guidance on documents and actions originating from these organizations; and• increased grant funding to foster translational work that advances understanding of low-level radiation and biological effects.

Maintaining competence in radiological protection in emergency situations: a challenge for the 21st century

German radiation oncology's next generation: a web-based survey of young biologists, medical physicists, and physicians-from problems to solutions

Awareness and preparedness level of medical workers for radiation and nuclear emergency response

Radiological preparedness-awareness and attitudes: a cross-sectional survey of emergency medicine residents and physicians at three academic institutions in the United States

Basic concepts of radiation emergency medicine

Medical radiation countermeasures for nuclear and radiological emergencies: Current status and future perspectives

Lessons learned from Chernobyl and other emergencies: establishing international requirements and guidance

[From personnel administration to human resource management : demographic risk management in hospitals]

Public health response and medical management of internal contamination in past radiological or nuclear incidents: A narrative review

Developing a Nuclear Global Health Workforce Amid the Increasing Threat of a Nuclear Crisis

A comprehensive review of dose limits, triage systems and measurement tools for consequence management of nuclear and radiological emergencies

An Overview of Appropriate Medical Practice and Preparedness in Radiation Emergency Response

Meeting the Needs for Radiation Protection: Diagnostic Imaging

Towards a strategic research agenda for social sciences and humanities in radiological protection

Education and training in health physics--a look to the future

Successful Teaching of Radiobiology Students in the Medical Management of Acute Radiation Effects From Real Case Histories Using Clinical Signs and Symptoms and Taking Advantage of Recently Developed Software Tools

Note on testing of radiological events in conventional and dental radiology

State of Academic Radiology: Current Challenges, Future Adaptations

Guardians of precision: advancing radiation protection, safety, and quality systems in nuclear medicine

Radiological Emergency Preparedness: A Survey of Nuclear Medicine Technologists in the United States

Enhancing First Responder Safety in Nuclear Radiological Emergencies: A Systematic Literature Review of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Training to Promote Self-Efficacy Among First Responders