(405) Gonadis National Registry On Gonadal Status In Pituitary And Adrenal Disorders: Prevalence And Characterization Of Sexual Dysfunctions In Male Patients With Hyperprolactinemia
Dr Antonio De Fraia,Dr Elisa Maseroli,Dr Emilia Sbardella,Dr Cristina de Angelis,Dr Marianna Minnetti,Prof Renata Simona Auriemma,Dr Rita Indirli,Dr Caterina Golinelli,Dr Angelo Cignarelli,Dr Luigi Aversa,Prof Linda Vignozzi,Prof Giovanni Corona,Prof Andrea Isidori,Prof Rosario Pivonello
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae041.034
2024-06-15
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Abstract:Objectives Hyperprolactinemia is frequently accompanied by sexual dysfunctions, represented by decreased libido, and erectile and ejaculatory disorders. Moreover, cabergoline (CAB), used for the treatment of hyperprolactinemia is known to influence sexual function. Aim of the study was to evaluate sexual function in adult men with hyperprolactinemia under medical therapy, by also addressing the role of disease control. Methods Data on sexual function addressed by Structured Interview on Erectile Dysfunction (SIEDY), Androtest, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-15 and Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) and psychological traits by Middlesex Hospital Questionnaire (MHQ) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) questionnaires, and on hormonal profile, were retrieved from GONADIS, an Italian registry on gonadal status and reproductive and psycho-sexual function in patients with pituitary and adrenal disorders, promoted by SIAMS-SIE-AME. Twenty-three men with hyperprolactinemia aged 25-76 yrs (median: 49 yrs) under CAB treatment were recruited. Between-group differences were analyzed by Mann–Whitney and Chi-squared test, and correlation of continuous variables by Spearman test, using SPSS-Statistics software. Results In the overall cohort, 12/23(52.2%) patients reached disease control; CAB dose negatively correlated with free anxiety (MHQ-A)(p=0.016), obsession (MHQ-O)(p=0.025), somatization (MHQ-S)(p=0.024), depression (MHQ-D)(p=0.046) and hysteria (MHQ-H)(p=0.030). In uncontrolled patients, CAB dose positively correlated with IIEF-15 overall satisfaction domain score (p<0.021) and prolactin negatively correlated with IIEF-15 intercourse satisfaction domain score (p<0.027); in controlled patients, CAB dose negatively correlated with MHQ-S (p<0.028) and MHQ-H (p<0.03). Controlled and uncontrolled patients did not differ for continuous variables of interest nor for the prevalence of psycho-sexual dysfunctions. Conclusions In uncontrolled patients, a worse disease control (i.e. higher prolactin) is associated with a worse intercourse satisfaction, and CAB treatment positively impacts on overall satisfaction; a tighter disease control by increasing CAB dose should be encouraged. In controlled patients, CAB dose positively impacts on somatization and hysteria traits, which might contribute to general and sexual health, regardless of prolactin levels, suggesting that it might be due to CAB dopaminergic properties. Conflicts of Interest Authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
urology & nephrology