Abstract:The criminal justice system is currently ill-equipped to improve outcomes of individuals who cycle in and out of the system with a series of misdemeanor offenses. Often due to constraints of caseload and poor record linkage, prior interactions with an individual may not be considered when an individual comes back into the system, let alone in a proactive manner through the application of diversion programs. The Los Angeles City Attorney's Office recently created a new Recidivism Reduction and Drug Diversion unit (R2D2) tasked with reducing recidivism in this population. Here we describe a collaboration with this new unit as a case study for the incorporation of predictive equity into machine learning based decision making in a resource-constrained setting. The program seeks to improve outcomes by developing individually-tailored social service interventions (i.e., diversions, conditional plea agreements, stayed sentencing, or other favorable case disposition based on appropriate social service linkage rather than traditional sentencing methods) for individuals likely to experience subsequent interactions with the criminal justice system, a time and resource-intensive undertaking that necessitates an ability to focus resources on individuals most likely to be involved in a future case. Seeking to achieve both efficiency (through predictive accuracy) and equity (improving outcomes in traditionally under-served communities and working to mitigate existing disparities in criminal justice outcomes), we discuss the equity outcomes we seek to achieve, describe the corresponding choice of a metric for measuring predictive fairness in this context, and explore a set of options for balancing equity and efficiency when building and selecting machine learning models in an operational public policy setting.

Using civil representation to reduce delinquency among troubled youth

Some Implications for North Carolina of Recent Research in Juvenile Delinquency

Comorbid Adolescent Difficulties: Social Work Prevention of Delinquency and Serious Youthful Offending

Can Restorative Justice Conferencing Reduce Recidivism? Evidence From the Make‐it‐Right Program

Effective family‐based program options for justice‐involved youth

Thinking, Fast and Slow? Some Field Experiments to Reduce Crime and Dropout in Chicago

Examining the effectiveness of a restorative justice program for various types of juvenile offenders

Describing theoretical underpinnings in juvenile justice diversion: A case study explicating Teen Court program theory to guide research and practice

The Affluent Youthful Offender

Adolescent Contact, Lasting Impact? Lessons Learned From Two Longitudinal Studies Spanning 20 Years of Developmental Science Research With Justice-System-Involved Youths

The efficacy of prosecutor-led, adult diversion for misdemeanor offenses

Juvenile Justice Education For At-risk High School Youth: A Pilot Program

Truancy Intervention Reduces Crime: Results from a Randomized Field Trial

Mixed methods evaluation of a jail diversion program: Impact on arrests and functioning

The Influence of Routine Health care on Reoffending in a Sample of Gun Involved Youths

Addressing the Hispanic Delinquency and Mental Health Relationship Through Cultural Arts Programming: A Research Note From the Prodigy Evaluation

Programmatic prevention of adolescent problem behaviors: the role of autonomy, relatedness, and volunteer service in the Teen Outreach Program

Criminogenic Risk, Criminogenic Need, Collective Efficacy, and Juvenile Delinquency

PROTOCOL: Effectiveness of parent-engagement programs to reduce truancy and juvenile delinquency: A systematic review

The Effectiveness of Restorative Justice in Resolving Juvenile Criminal Cases: An Examination of Legal and Social Perspectives

Case Study: Predictive Fairness to Reduce Misdemeanor Recidivism Through Social Service Interventions