Abstract:Durotaxis – the ability of cells to sense and migrate along stiffness gradients – is important for embryonic development and has been implicated in pathologies including fibrosis and cancer. Although cellular processes can sometimes turn toward softer environments, durotaxis at the level of cells has thus far been observed exclusively as migration from soft to stiff regions. The molecular basis of durotaxis, especially the factors that contribute to different durotactic behaviors in various cell types, are still inadequately understood. With the recent discovery of ‘optimal stiffness’, where cells generate maximal traction forces on substrates in an intermediate stiffness range, we hypothesized that some migratory cells may be capable of moving away from stiff environments and toward matrix on which they can generate more traction. Combining hydrogel-based stiffness gradients, live-cell imaging, genetic manipulations, and computational modeling, we found that cells move preferentially toward their stiffness optimum for maximal force transmission. Importantly, we directly observed biased migration toward softer environments, i.e. ‘negative durotaxis’, in human glioblastoma cells. This directional migration did not coincide with changes in FAK, ERK or YAP signaling, or with altered actomyosin contractility. Instead, integrin-mediated adhesion and motor-clutch dynamics alone are sufficient to generate asymmetric traction to drive both positive and negative durotaxis. We verified this mechanistically by applying a motor-clutch-based model to explain negative durotaxis in the glioblastoma cells and in neurites, and experimentally by switching breast cancer cells from positive to negative durotaxis via talin downregulation. Our results identify the likely molecular mechanisms of durotaxis, with a cell’s contractile and adhesive machinery dictating its capacity to exert traction on mechanically distinct substrates, directing cell migration. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Persistence-driven durotaxis: Generic, directed motility in rigidity gradients

Elastic interactions compete with persistent cell motility to drive durotaxis

Random Walker Models for Durotaxis

Persistent Random Walks: a Unified Theory for Durotaxis and Negative Durotaxis

Collective durotaxis of cohesive cell clusters on a stiffness gradient

Frictiotaxis underlies adhesion-independent durotaxis

Durotaxis: the mechanical control of directed cell migration

Durotaxis and antidurotaxis droplet motion onto gradient gel-substrates

Positive and negative durotaxis - mechanisms and emerging concepts

Rotational constraint contributes to collective cell durotaxis

Negative durotaxis: cell movement toward softer environments

Directed cell migration towards softer environments

Amoeboid cells undergo durotaxis with soft end polarized NMIIA

Collective Motility, Mechanical Waves, and Durotaxis in Cell Clusters

The Golgi microtubules regulate single cell durotaxis

Collective durotaxis along a self-generated mobile stiffness gradient in vivo

An elastic-damaging cohesive law for cell-substrate adhesion with positive and negative durotaxis

Stiffness-guided motion of a droplet on a solid substrate

A multiscale whole-cell theory for mechano-sensitive migration on viscoelastic substrates

A multiscale whole-cell theory for mechanosensitive migration on viscoelastic substrates

Cell motility, synchronization, and cell traction orientational order