Abstract:Human observers searched a background texture of 639 uniformly tilted bars, spanning 34°×46° in visual angle, for a bar with a unique tilt located at one of 28 locations, 15° from the display's centre. There were three critical, randomly interleaved, trial conditions: monocular, with all bars presented to the same single eye; and dichoptic congruent (DC) or incongruent (DI), involving an ocular singleton that was either the target bar (DC) or a background bar on the opposite lateral side from the target (DI). When the target bar was tilted 50° from the background bars, reaction times to report whether it was in the left or right half of the display were shorter in the DC condition, longer in the DI condition, than that in the monocular condition, whether or not subjects were aware or informed of the different dichoptic conditions. In another experiment, when the target bar was tilted 20° from the horizontal background bars, and with all bars having the same (uniform) or different (non-uniform) luminance values and being masked after 200 milliseconds, observers' reports of the target's tilt direction from horizontal were more accurate in DC than the other conditions, irrespective of the luminance condition. With the same stimuli, but without a tilt singleton, the same observers were at chance reporting the existence of an ocular singleton when the bars had non-uniform luminances. These findings suggest that the ocular singleton acted as a valid or invalid exogenous cue to the target. Further experiments showed that set size effects in a difficult visual search under monocular presentation can be dramatically diminished in the DC presentation. Since primary visual cortex (V1) has substantially more monocular cells (for eye origin information) than other visual areas, and is least associated with awareness, our findings support the hypothesis that V1 acts as a bottom-up saliency map (Li 2002, Trends Cognitive Sciences, 6(1):9–16).

Vanishing point attracts gaze in free-viewing and visual search tasks

Visible Persistence Speeds Up Visual Search

Vanishing Point Attracts Eye Movements in Scene Free-viewing

Eye Tracking Evidence for V1 Saliency Hypothesis from an Anomalous Visual Search Behavior

Effects of Location-based and Object-based Selective Attention in Visual Target Detection Tasks

Eye Movement Evidence for the V1 Saliency Hypothesis and the Central-peripheral Dichotomy Theory in an Anomalous Visual Search Task.

Gaze-induced joint attention persists under high perceptual load and does not depend on awareness.

Influence Of Visual Region And Color On Target Identify

Fixation prediction with a combined model of bottom-up saliency and vanishing point

Gaze capture by eye-of-origin singletons: interdependence with awareness.

Strong Exogenous Attraction to Attention by Unique Eye of Origin -- Evidence for a Bottom-Up Saliency Map in the Primary Visual Cortex

Enhancing Fixation and Pursuit: Optimizing Field of View and Number of Targets for Selection Performance in Virtual Reality

Pop-out vs. Glue: A Study on the pre-attentive and focused attention stages in Visual Search tasks

Imperceptible Gaze Guidance Through Ocularity in Virtual Reality

The Advantage for Action Video Game Players in Eye Movement Behavior During Visual Search Tasks

Response, rather than target detection, triggers the attentional boost effect in visual search.

After-search--visual search by gaze shifts after input image vanishes.

Parallel Advantage: Further Evidence for Bottom-up Saliency Computation by Human Primary Visual Cortex

Gaze Capture by Task-Irrelevant, Eye of Origin, Singletons Even Without Awareness During Visual Search

Analysis of Eye Gaze Points Based on Visual Search

Interaction Between Depth and Ocularity Features in Attentional Attraction During Visual Search