Abstract:This paper presents and compares two candidate large-scale propagation path loss models, the alpha-beta-gamma (ABG) model and the close-in (CI) free space reference distance model, for the design of fifth generation (5G) wireless communication systems in urban micro- and macro-cellular scenarios. Comparisons are made using the data obtained from 20 propagation measurement campaigns or ray-tracing studies from 2 GHz to 73.5 GHz over distances ranging from 5 m to 1429 m. The results show that the one-parameter CI model has a very similar goodness of fit (i.e., the shadow fading standard deviation) in both line-of-sight and non-line-of-sight environments, while offering substantial simplicity and more stable behavior across frequencies and distances, as compared to the three-parameter ABG model. Additionally, the CI model needs only one very subtle and simple modification to the existing 3GPP floating-intercept path loss model (replacing a constant with a close-in free space reference value) in order to provide greater simulation accuracy, more simplicity, better repeatability across experiments, and higher stability across a vast range of frequencies.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to solve the large - scale propagation path loss modeling problem in the fifth - generation (5G) wireless communication systems in urban micro - cellular (Urban Micro - cellular, UMi) and macro - cellular (Urban Macro - cellular, UMa) scenarios. Specifically, the paper compares two candidate large - scale propagation path loss models: the alpha - beta - gamma (ABG) model and the Close - In Free Space Reference Distance (CI) model. The purpose of these models is to design more efficient and reliable 5G wireless communication systems, especially for applications in the millimeter - wave band (mmWave). ### Main problems 1. **Model selection and comparison**: - By comparing the performance of the ABG model and the CI model at different frequencies (from 2 GHz to 73.5 GHz) and distances (from 5 m to 1429 m), the paper evaluates the applicability of these two models in urban micro - cellular and macro - cellular scenarios. - Special attention is paid to the goodness - of - fit of the models (i.e., the standard deviation of shadow fading), parameter stability, and behavior at different frequencies and distances. 2. **Model performance evaluation**: - By analyzing the data from 20 propagation measurement campaigns or ray - tracing studies, the paper evaluates the performance of these two models in line - of - sight (LOS) and non - line - of - sight (NLOS) environments. - Attention is focused on the simplicity, stability, and simulation accuracy of the models, especially in repeated experiments across frequencies and distances. ### Main findings - **Advantages of the CI model**: - The CI model has very similar goodness - of - fit (standard deviation of shadow fading) in LOS and NLOS environments, and its behavior is more stable across frequencies and distances. - The CI model only requires a very minor modification to the existing 3GPP floating - intercept path loss model (replacing the constant with a close - in free - space reference value) to provide higher simulation accuracy, better repeatability, and higher stability. - The CI model is simpler in terms of parameter optimization, having only one parameter (path loss exponent, PLE), which makes the model easier to understand and apply. - **Limitations of the ABG model**: - Although the ABG model can provide a slightly smaller standard deviation of shadow fading in some cases, its three parameters (α, β, γ) vary greatly at different frequencies and distances, resulting in larger errors in the model's predictions across frequencies and distances. - The ABG model may give unrealistic low values in path loss predictions at short distances (e.g., within 4 m), and may underestimate signal strength at long distances. ### Conclusion The paper suggests that when designing 5G wireless communication systems, the CI model is a better choice due to its simplicity, physical basis, and higher stability. Although the ABG model can provide a slightly better goodness - of - fit in some cases, its complexity and parameter instability make it less reliable in practical applications than the CI model.

Propagation Path Loss Models for 5G Urban Micro- and Macro-Cellular Scenarios

A Prediction Study of Path Loss Models from 2-73.5 GHz in an Urban-Macro Environment

Propagation path loss prediction modelling in enclosed environments for 5G networks: A review

Comparison of Radio Propagation Models for Long Term Evolution (LTE) Network

New indoor propagation model proposed for future B5G/6G rollout

An improved path loss model for 5G wireless networks in an enclosed hallway

Urban Outdoor Propagation Measurements and Channel Models at 6.75 GHz FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz FR3 Upper Mid-Band Spectrum for 5G and 6G

Indoor 5G 3GPP-like Channel Models for Office and Shopping Mall Environments

3.5 GHz Coverage Assessment with a 5G Testbed

Millimeter Wave and Terahertz Urban Microcell Propagation Measurements and Models

Small-Scale, Local Area, and Transitional Millimeter Wave Propagation for 5G Communications

Performance Evaluation and Analysis of Urban-Suburban 5G Cellular Networks

Investigation and Comparison of 3GPP and NYUSIM Channel Models for 5G Wireless Communications

Study on 3GPP rural macrocell path loss models for millimeter wave wireless communications

Performance analysis of mmWave radio propagations in an indoor environment for 5G networks

140 GHz Urban Microcell Propagation Measurements for Spatial Consistency Modeling

Three-Dimensional Ray-Tracing-Based Propagation Prediction Model for Macrocellular Environment at Sub-6 GHz Frequencies

Comprehensive Overview on Millimeter Wave Communications for 5G Networks Concentrating on Propagation Models for Different Urban Environments

Indoor Office Plan Environment and Layout-Based MmWave Path Loss Models for 28 GHz and 73 GHz

Comparative Analysis of Major Machine-Learning-Based Path Loss Models for Enclosed Indoor Channels