Abstract:Background: Signal reliability poses a central problem for explaining the evolution of communication. According to Zahavi's Handicap Principle, signals are honest only if they are costly at the evolutionary equilibrium; otherwise, deception becomes common and communication breaks down. Theoretical signalling games have proved to be useful for understanding the logic of signalling interactions. Theoretical evaluations of the Handicap Principle are difficult, however, because finding the equilibrium cost function in such signalling games is notoriously complicated. Here, we provide a general solution to this problem and show how cost functions can be calculated for any arbitrary, pairwise asymmetric signalling game at the evolutionary equilibrium. Results: Our model clarifies the relationship between signalling costs at equilibrium and the conditions for reliable signalling. It shows that these two terms are independent in both additive and multiplicative models, and that the cost of signalling at honest equilibrium has no effect on the stability of communication. Moreover, it demonstrates that honest signals at the equilibrium can have any cost value, even negative, being beneficial for the signaller independently of the receiver's response at equilibrium and without requiring further constraints. Our results are general and we show how they apply to seminal signalling models, including Grafen's model of sexual selection and Godfray's model of parent-offspring communication. Conclusions: Our results refute the claim that signals must be costly at the evolutionary equilibrium to be reliable, as predicted by the Handicap Principle and so-called 'costly signalling' theory. Thus, our results raise serious concerns about the handicap paradigm. We argue that the evolution of reliable signalling is better understood within a Darwinian life-history framework, and that the conditions for honest signalling are more clearly stated and understood by evaluating their trade-offs rather than their costs per se. We discuss potential shortcomings of equilibrium models and we provide testable predictions to help advance the field and establish a better explanation for honest signals. Last but not least, our results highlight why signals are expected to be efficient rather than wasteful.

Honest signaling in zero-sum games is hard, and lying is even harder

Signaling in Quasipolynomial time

On the Hardness of Signaling

Modeling and Analysis of Leaky Deception using Signaling Games with Evidence

Honesty in signalling games is maintained by trade-offs rather than costs

Commitment with Signaling under Double-sided Information Asymmetry

When honesty and cheating pay off: the evolution of honest and dishonest equilibria in a conventional signalling game

Distributed Signaling Games

Cognitive Neuroscience of Honesty and Deception: a Signaling Framework

Improper Signaling on the Two-user SISO Interference Channel

Mechanism Design with Moral Bidders

The signal-burying game can explain why we obscure positive traits and good deeds

Signaling with Private Monitoring

Strategically revealing capabilities in General Lotto games

A Soluble Model for the Conflict between Lying and Truth-Telling

Privacy signaling games with binary alphabets

Imperfect Signaling and the Local Credibility Test

Modeling Bluffing Behavior in Signaling Security Games.

Signaling Games in Multiple Dimensions: Geometric Properties of Equilibrium Solutions

Monotone Equilibria in Signalling Games

Deception by Design: Evidence-Based Signaling Games for Network Defense