Abstract:Background: It has been consistently demonstrated that infertility is associated with quality of life (QOL) impairments. Research to date has mostly focused on individual's reactions to infertility (mainly women), without an examination of how the partner is reacting to the same condition. The few studies that assessed QOL among couples did not use couple-based analyses, consequently not considering the intra-couple effects. The objectives of this study were to explore the congruence of QOL perception within infertile couples and to estimate the effect of depression levels on the congruence. Methods: In total, 162 couples were interviewed in an assisted reproduction clinic cross-sectionally. Subjects completed a socio-demographic form, World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF and the Beck Depression Inventory independently. The statistical strategy was guided to ensure that subjects would be explored within pairs at all times and not as independent groups. Paired t-tests were run, and Cohen's effect was estimated. Depression levels were controlled by linear multiple regressions and repeated-measures ANCOVAs. Results: Out of the five QOL domain scores, only two showed a significant discrepancy between partners (psychological and social relationship domains). Male depression was a significant predictor for all five QOL difference scores, whereas female depression was associated with three (overall, psychological and physical). Moreover, it was demonstrated that, except for the psychological domain and for the female depression on the physical domain, the load of depression as a predictor of the QOL difference scores was markedly low, accounting for not more than 7.5% of the variance of congruence between men's and women's QOL. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that QOL scores do not differ markedly between spouses. Since QOL seemed similarly affected in both men and women, consideration might be given to offering interventions to them as a dyad. These results are not in line with the previous non-paired studies, and further investigations are required to address this dissimilarity.

Couple differentiation and health‐related quality of life

Perceived overlap and therapy outcomes among couple clients

Study on Quality of Well-Being in Clinical Physical Examination

Dyadic profiles of couples' self-perceptions of aging: Implications for mental health.

Family-of-Origin, Differentiation of Self and Partner, and Adult Romantic Relationship Quality

Describing health-related outcomes for couples experiencing prostate cancer: differences and similarities

A cohort study of quality of life in partners of young breast cancer survivors compared to partners of healthy controls

Congruence of quality of life among infertile men and women: findings from a couple-based study

Sexual Expression and Subsequent Marital Quality Among Partnered Older Adults

Marital Quality and Well-Being Among Older Adults: A Typology of Supportive, Aversive, Indifferent, and Ambivalent Marriages

Couple Relationships In Persons With Schizophrenia: Intimacy, Passion, And Commitment

Assessing longitudinal quality of life in prostate cancer patients and their spouses: a multilevel modeling approach

Trajectories of dyadic quality of life in young to middle-aged stroke couples: a longitudinal study

The association between mindfulness and couple quality: The mediating roles of self‐care and engagement in shared relationship activities

Relationship Quality Among Persons with Serious Mental Illness and Their Relatives: Rates and Correlates

Quality Dating and Wellness Among a Religious College Student Population: A Mixed-Methods Approach

The crucible differentiation scale: assessing differentiation in human relationships

Couple affection exchange profiles and marital quality in Chinese couples

Differentiation of Self and Mate Retention Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Communication Patterns

Couples' Ratings of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients' Quality of Life

Relationship Quality Among Cohabiting Versus Married Couples