Inadequate experimental methods and erroneous epilepsy diagnostic criteria result in confounding acquired focal epilepsy with genetic absence epilepsy

Raimondo D'Ambrosio,Clifford L. Eastman,John W. Miller
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1509.01206
2015-09-04
Abstract:Here we provide a thorough discussion of the study conducted by Rodgers et al. (J Neurosci. 2015; 35(24):9194-204. doi: <a class="link-https link-external" data-doi="10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0919-15.2015" href="https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0919-15.2015" rel="external noopener nofollow">https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0919-15.2015</a>) to investigate focal seizures and acquired epileptogenesis induced by head injury in the rat. This manuscript serves as supplementary document for our letter to the Editor to appear in the Journal of Neuroscience. We find that the subject article suffers from poor experimental design, very selective consideration of antecedent literature, and application of inappropriate epilepsy diagnostic criteria which, together, lead to unwarranted conclusions.
Neurons and Cognition
What problem does this paper attempt to address?