Abstract:One of the important extensions of Riemann geometry is Weyl geometry, which is essentially based on the ideas of conformal invariance and nonmetricity. A similar non-Riemannian geometry was proposed by Erwin Schrödinger in the late 1940s, in a geometry which is simpler, and (probably) more elegant than the Weyl geometry. Even if it contains nonmetricity, the Schrödinger connection preserves the length of vectors under parallel transport, and thus seems to be more physical than the Weyl connection. Interestingly enough, Schrödinger's approach did not attract much interest in the field of gravitational physics. It is the goal of the present paper to reconsider the Schrödinger geometry as a potential candidate for a gravitational theory extending standard general relativity. We consider a gravitational action constructed from a length preserving nonmetricity, in the absence of torsion, and investigate its variation in both Palatini and metric formalisms. While the Palatini variation leads to standard general relativity, the metric version of the theory adds some nonmetricity dependent extra terms in the gravitational Einstein equations, which can be interpreted as representing a geometric type dark energy. After obtaining the generalized Friedmann equations, we analyze in detail the cosmological implications of the theory, by considering two distinct models, corresponding to a dark energy satisfying a linear equation of state, and to conserved matter energy, respectively. In both cases we compare the predictions of the Weyl-Schrödinger cosmology with a set of observational data for the Hubble function, and with the results of the ΛCDM standard paradigm. Our results show that the Weyl-Schrödinger cosmological models give a good description of the observational data, and, for certain values of the model parameters, they can reproduce almost exactly the predictions of the ΛCDM model. Hence, the Weyl-Schrödinger theory represents a simple, and viable alternative to standard general relativity, in which dark energy is of purely geometric origin. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.024003 © 2024 American Physical Society

Is Weyl unified theory wrong or incomplete?

On the physical consequences of a Weyl invariant theory of gravity

From spacetime thermodynamics to Weyl transverse gravity

Why the Weyl Tile Argument is Wrong

The changing concept of matter in H. Weyl's thought, 1918 -1930

Weyl conformal geometry vs Weyl anomaly

The Weyl anomaly and the nature of the background geometry

From the Weyl-Schrödinger connection to the accelerating Universe: Extending Einstein's gravity via a length preserving nonmetricity

Cosmological implications of the Weyl geometric gravity theory

Unification of the Fundamental Forces in Higher-Order Riemannian Geometry

Weyl quadratic gravity as a gauge theory and non-metricity vs torsion duality

From the Weyl-Schrödinger connection to the accelerating Universe -- extending Einstein's gravity via a length preserving nonmetricity

On the Hole Argument and the Physical Interpretation of General Relativity

Unit Invariance as a Unifying Principle of Physics

On the nature of discrete space-time: The atomic theory of space-time and its effects on Pythagoras's theorem, time versus duration, inertial anomalies of astronomical bodies, and special relativity at the Planck scale

Nonexistence of a parent theory for general relativity and unimodular gravity

The Mathematical Foundations of Gauge Theory Revisited

Was Einstein 100% right ?