Abstract:This study compares the application of two variable selection methods in partial least squares regression (PLSR), the variable importance in projection (VIP) method and the selectivity ratio (SR) method. For this purpose, three different data sets were analysed: (a) physiochemical water quality parameters related to sensorial data, (b) gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) chemical (organic compound) profiles from fossil sea sediment samples related to sea surface temperature (SST) changes, and (c) exposed genes of Daphnia magna female samples related to their total offspring production. Correlation coefficients (r), levels of significance (p‐value) and interpretation of the underlying experimental phenomena allowed the discussion about the best approach for variable selection in each case. The comparison of the two variable selection methods in the first water quality data set showed that the SR method is more accurate for sensorial prediction. For the climate data set, when raw total ion current (TIC) GC‐MS chromatograms were considered, variables selected using the VIP method were easier to interpret compared with those selected by the SR method. However, when only some chromatographic peak areas (concentrations) were considered, the SR method was more efficient for prediction, and the VIP method selected the most relevant variables for the interpretation of SST changes. Finally, for the transcriptomic data set, the SR method was found again to be more reliable for prediction purposes. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. VIP and SR variable selection methods in partial least squares regression were compared in three different data sets. VIP method was more reliable than the SR method for raw large chromatographic data sets, but for other types of preprocessed or transformed data sets both methods detected efficiently the most relevant variables. SR method was more accurate for prediction purposes, and VIP method was more reliable for the interpretation of the underlying experimental phenomena.

Projection predictive variable selection using Stan+R

Faithful Variable Screening for High-Dimensional Convex Regression

Variable selection using axis-aligned random projections for partial least-squares regression

Using reference models in variable selection

Variable selection for both outcomes and predictors: sparse multivariate principal covariates regression

Projection Predictive Inference for Generalized Linear and Additive Multilevel Models

Scalable variable selection for two-view learning tasks with projection operators

Examining variable selection methods for the predictive performance of regression models and the proportion of selected variables and selected random variables

Bayesian Variable Selection with Related Predictors

An Efficient Variable Selection Method for Predictive Discriminant Analysis

Variable Selection with Stepwise and Best Subset Approaches.

Variable selection for Gaussian process regression through a sparse projection

Variable selection and validation in multivariate modelling

Variable selection for Gaussian processes via sensitivity analysis of the posterior predictive distribution

Principal Component Regression by Principal Component Selection

Model-independent variable selection via the rule-based variable priority

A Two-Stage Variable Selection Approach for Correlated High Dimensional Predictors

A Transparent and Nonlinear Method for Variable Selection

Prediction-based variable selection for component-wise gradient boosting

A comparison of random forest variable selection methods for classification prediction modeling

Comparison of the variable importance in projection (VIP) and of the selectivity ratio (SR) methods for variable selection and interpretation