Abstract:Although there has been an increasing body of work on social loafing for over ten years, there are still gaps in our understanding that require further investigation. There is currently a lack of research on organizational justice and the sense of duty towards social loafing. This study examines how organizational fairness (procedural, distributive, interactional) affects social loafing to address a gap in the existing literature. According to social exchange theory, the study predicted that perceived obligation would act as a mediator in the relationship between organizational justice and social loafing. Information was collected from 272 private sector employees in Malaysia. The measurements were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. With the exception of distributive justice, most direct links have a considerable influence on social loafing, as indicated by the data. Statistical findings confirmed the mediating role of perceived obligation between procedural fairness, distributive justice, and social loafing. The findings did not show that felt obligation plays a mediating role in the link between interactional justice and social loafing behavior. The study advanced knowledge by establishing new connections between organizational fairness, felt obligation, and social loafing behavior. Distinct measures of employees' perceptions of organizational justice offer a more comprehensive understanding of the connection between negative outcomes and their views of the organization. Additionally, the reciprocation process explains the link between organizational justice and social loafing. This research demonstrates that organizational fairness is a crucial component in predicting social loafing behavior, which would be advantageous for employers and human resource experts. Improvements can be made by establishing equitable and uniform workplace standards, encouraging employee input and involvement in decision-making, and demonstrating decency and respect for subordinates to prevent counterproductive actions like social loafing.

Perceived Social Loafing in Undergraduate Software Engineering Teams

Social Loafing Among Members of Undergraduate Software Engineering Groups: Persistence of Perception Seven Years After

Social Loafing: A Field Investigation

Social Loafing: Understanding, Mitigating, and Enhancing Group Performance

Exploring the Application of Blockchain Technology to Combat the Effects of Social Loafing in Cross Functional Group Projects.

Social Loafing: A Review of the Literature

Why Do They Slack off in Teamwork? Understanding Frontline Hospitality Employees’ Social Loafing when Faced with Exploitative Leadership

Monitoring Student Activity in Collaborative Software Development

Group Laziness: the Effect of Social Loafing on Group Performance

Factors affecting cyberloafing in computer laboratory teaching settings

A Literature Review of Social Loafing and Teams with Group Development

Code Collaborate: Dissecting Team Dynamics in First-Semester Programming Students

Cyberloafing in IT classrooms: exploring the role of the psycho-social environment in the classroom, attitude to computers and computing courses, motivation and learning strategies

Cyberloafing: Exploring the Role of Psychological Wellbeing and Social Media Learning

What leads to cyberloafing: the empirical study of workload, self-efficacy, time management skills, and mediating effect of job satisfaction.

Employees' Intention to Comply with Information Security Policies: The Impacts of Loafing and Commitment

Emotional Intelligence, Communication Competence, and Student Perceptions of Team Social Cohesion

Effects of Organizational Justice on Social Loafing: The Mediating Role of Felt Obligation

Identifying struggling teams in online challenge-based learning

Perceptions of Task Interdependence in Software Development: An Industrial Case Study

Building Collaborative Learning: Exploring Social Annotation in Introductory Programming