Oluwatomi A. Akindele,Adam Bernstein,Eric B. Norman
Abstract:Various groups have demonstrated that antineutrino monitoring can be successful in assessing the plutonium content in water-cooled nuclear reactors for nonproliferation applications. New reactor designs and concepts incorporate nontraditional fuels types and chemistry. Understanding how these properties affect the antineutrino emission from a reactor can extend the applicability of antineutrino monitoring. Thorium molten salt reactors (MSR) breed U-233, that if diverted constitute a direct use material as defined by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The antineutrino spectrum from the fission of U-233 has been estimated for the first time, and the feasibility of detecting the diversion of 8 kg of U-233, within a 30 day timeliness goal has been evaluated. The antineutrino emission from a thorium reactor operating under normal conditions is compared to a diversion scenario by evaluating the daily antineutrino count rate and the energy spectrum of the detected antineutrinos at a 25 meter standoff. It was found that the diversion of a significant quantity of U-233 could not be detected within the current IAEA timeliness detection goal using either tests. A rate-time based analysis exceeded the timeliness goal by 23 days, while a spectral based analysis exceeds this goal by 31 days.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to explore the feasibility of using antineutrino monitoring technology to detect the illegal transfer of 233U in Thorium Molten Salt Reactors (MSR). Specifically, the paper focuses on whether the transfer of 8 kg of 233U can be detected by antineutrino monitoring within the time target set by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), that is, within 30 days.
### Main research questions in the paper
1. **Evaluating the feasibility of antineutrino monitoring**:
- Research whether antineutrino monitoring can be used to detect the illegal transfer of 233U in Thorium Molten Salt Reactors.
- Evaluate whether the transfer of 8 kg of 233U can be detected within the 30 - day time target.
2. **Calculating the antineutrino spectrum of 233U**:
- Since the antineutrino spectrum of 233U is not available in the public literature, the paper estimates the antineutrino spectrum of 233U by the aggregation and summation method.
- Compare the antineutrino spectra of 233U and 235U to determine their differences in energy distribution.
3. **Analyzing the changes in antineutrino count rate and energy spectrum**:
- By comparing the antineutrino count rate and energy spectrum in normal operation and abnormal situations, evaluate the ability to detect the transfer of 233U.
- Use statistical methods (such as maximum - likelihood analysis and least - squares regression) to analyze antineutrino data to determine the time required to detect the transfer.
### Main conclusions
- **Energy spectrum analysis**: During the 86 - day counting period, the energy spectrum analysis reached a 95% confidence level, but exceeded the IAEA's 30 - day time target.
- **Count rate evolution analysis**: During the 78 - day counting period, the count rate evolution analysis reached a 95% confidence level, also exceeding the IAEA's time target.
- **Detection sensitivity**: The detection results are very sensitive to count statistics. The detection performance can be improved by improving the antineutrino detector (such as increasing the instrument precision or the detector mass).
### Significance of the paper
- **Nuclear non - proliferation applications**: This research provides new ideas and methods for using antineutrino monitoring technology in the field of nuclear non - proliferation.
- **Reactor safety**: Through non - invasive remote monitoring technology, the safety supervision ability of new reactors (such as Thorium Molten Salt Reactors) can be improved.
### Formulas
- **Antineutrino energy spectrum**:
\[
N(E_v)=\sum_n Y_n(Z,A,t)\times\sum_i b_{n,i}(E_i^0)P_v(E_v,E_i^0,Z)
\]
where \(Y_n(Z,A,t)\) is the number of β - decays per second of a given isotope, \(b_{n,i}(E_i^0)\) is the branching ratio of the excited state, and \(P_v(E_v,E_i^0,Z)\) is the energy - spectrum shape factor.
- **Energy - spectrum shape factor**:
\[
P_v = kE_v^2(E_0 - E_v)^2F(E_0,Z)
\]
where \(k\) is a normalization constant and \(F(E_0,Z)\) is the Fermi - Coulomb function.
- **Antineutrino count rate**:
\[
D(E_v)=\frac{T\rho_p V\epsilon}{4\pi r^2}\sigma(E_v)\phi(\bar{E}_v)P_{ee}(E_v,r)
\]
where \(\rho_p\) is the proton density, \(V\) is the detection volume, \(\epsilon\) is the detection efficiency, \(T\) is the counting time, \(r\) is the distance between the detector and the reactor core, \(\sigma(E_v)\) is the interaction cross - section of antineutrinos, \(\phi(\bar{E}_v)\) is the antineutrino flux, and \(P_{ee}(E_v,r)\) is the survival probability.
These formulas and analysis methods provide theoretical basis and technical support for evaluating the application of antineutrino monitoring technology in the field of nuclear non - proliferation.