Abstract:We present a comparison between Gaussian processes (GPs) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) as methods for determining photometric redshifts for galaxies, given training-set data. In particular, we compare their degradation in performance as the training-set size is degraded in ways which might be caused by the observational limitations of spectroscopy. Using publicly available regression codes, we find that performance with large, complete training sets is very similar, although the ANN achieves slightly smaller rms errors. Training sets with brighter magnitude limits than the test data do not strongly affect the performance of either algorithm, until the limits are so severe that they remove almost all of the high-redshift training objects. Similarly, the introduction of a plausible number (up to 10 per cent) of inaccurate redshifts into the training set has little effect on either method. However, if the size of the training set is reduced by random sampling, the rms errors of both methods increase, but they do so to a lesser extent and in a much smoother manner for the case of GP regression; for the example presented ANNZ has rms errors similar to 20 per cent worse than GP regression in the small training-set limit. Also, when training objects are removed at redshifts 1.3 < z < 1.7, to simulate the effects of the 'redshift desert' of optical spectroscopy, the GP regression is successful at interpolating across the redshift gap, while the ANN suffers from strong bias for test objects in this redshift range. Overall, GP regression has attractive properties for photometric redshift estimation, particularly for deep, high-redshift surveys where it is difficult to obtain a large, complete training set. At present, unlike the ANN code, public GP regression codes do not take account of inhomogeneous measurement errors on the photometric data, and thus cannot estimate reliable uncertainties on the predicted redshifts. However, a better treatment of errors is in principle possible, and the promising results in this paper suggest that such improved GP algorithms should be pursued.

Using gamma regression for photometric redshifts of survey galaxies

Robust Machine Learning Applied to Astronomical Datasets III: Probabilistic Photometric Redshifts for Galaxies and Quasars in the SDSS and GALEX

Augmenting machine learning photometric redshifts with Gaussian mixture models

Benchmarking and scalability of machine-learning methods for photometric redshift estimation

GalaxiesML: a dataset of galaxy images, photometry, redshifts, and structural parameters for machine learning

Machine learning applications in astrophysics: Photometric redshift estimation

NEW APPROACHES TO PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFT PREDICTION VIA GAUSSIAN PROCESS REGRESSION IN THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY

Photometric Redshift Analysis using Supervised Learning Algorithms and Deep Learning

Deep learning based photometric redshifts for the Kilo-Degree Survey Bright Galaxy Sample

Galaxy Zoo Morphology and Photometric Redshifts in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

Deep Learning Approach to Photometric Redshift Estimation

Transferability of Photometric Redshifts Determined using Machine Learning

Estimation of redshift and associated uncertainty of Fermi/LAT extra-galactic sources with Deep Learning

Photometric redshift estimation via deep learning

Exploring galactic properties with machine learning

The Overlooked Potential of Generalized Linear Models in Astronomy - I: Binomial Regression

The regression for the redshifts of galaxies in SDSS DR18

Probability density estimation of photometric redshifts based on machine learning

Data-driven photometric redshift estimation from type Ia supernovae light curves

Testing the transferability of machine learning techniques for determining photometric redshifts of galaxy catalogue populations

Photometric Redshift Estimation Using Gaussian Processes