Implementation And Effectiveness Outcomes Of OMT-HF Hospitalist Certification In A Community Hospital
Farhan Ishaq,Duc T. Nguyen,Edward A. Graviss,Shawn Tittle,David P. Bernard,Ebun O. Ebunlomo,Arvind Bhimaraj,Nadia Fida
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.10.445
IF: 6.592
2024-01-01
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Abstract:Background Significant gaps exist in the implementation of GDMT for HF. While hospitalization is an opportunity to optimize GDMT, there is no specific guide to aid implementation. Hospitalists play a vital role in bridging this gap. Objectives We implemented HFSA's Optimal Medical Therapy in Heart Failure (OMT-HF) for hospitalist certification at Houston Methodist Baytown - a Community Hospital. Our aims are: 1) Compare the impact of OMT-HF on implementation and effectiveness outcomes between the hospitalists intervention group (IG) and the hospitalists standard of care comparison group (SOC-CG), 2a) compare provider compliance to GDMT measures, and 2b) compare patient related clinical outcomes. Methods This is a prospective single center study. 1 of the 2 hospitalist groups completed OMT-HF from Nov 22- Jan 23. Patients were naturally randomized to each group based on preset call schedule. We included adults with a 1ᵒ/2ᵒ diagnosis of HF/LVEF ≤ 40% and excluded those in cardiogenic shock or unable to consent. Implementation outcomes were calculated as GDMT scores. Effectiveness outcomes were: length of stay (LOS), 30d mortality, 30d readmissions and QoL at baseline and 30d post discharge assessed by Minnesota Living with the Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). We calculated GDMT scores at discharge for core medications. Responses of the MLHFQ were used to generate the total, physical, and emotional dimension scores. Group differences were compared using the Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test or an unpaired t-test, as appropriate. Paired t-test was used to evaluate change in MLHFQ scores. All analyses were performed using Stata v17.0 A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results We present pilot data (n=33) of an ongoing trial. Baseline demographics were mean age 60 (53.0, 71.0) yrs, BMI 30.1 (23.8, 33.1) kg/m2, 74% men, 30% Hispanic & 23% Black. Comorbidities were CAD 44%, atrial fibrillation 30%, diabetes 52%, HTN 81%, hyperlipidemia 48%, and obstructive airway disease 23%. Most patients were NYHA 3. Table 1 shows the outcomes. 25 patients saw a certified physician. There was no statistical difference between the IG compared to SOC-CG in terms of GDMT score, 30d mortality, LOS and 30d readmissions. There was a trend towards improved GDMT utilization and slightly shorter LOS in IG vs. SOG-CG. When compared for QoL, patients seen by IG had a significant mean delta change in the physical dimension score of MLHFQ but not in total or emotional dimension scores. Conclusion In this limited pilot study, trends towards improved GDMT utilization and QoL scores in a real-world setting were seen after hospitalist HF certification, highlighting a hospitalist driven HF-care paradigm.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems