Abstract:Despite progress in perceptual tasks such as image classification, computers still perform poorly on cognitive tasks such as image description and question answering. Cognition is core to tasks that involve not just recognizing, but reasoning about our visual world. However, models used to tackle the rich content in images for cognitive tasks are still being trained using the same datasets designed for perceptual tasks. To achieve success at cognitive tasks, models need to understand the interactions and relationships between objects in an image. When asked “What vehicle is the person riding?”, computers will need to identify the objects in an image as well as the relationships riding(man, carriage) and pulling(horse, carriage) to answer correctly that “the person is riding a horse-drawn carriage.” In this paper, we present the Visual Genome dataset to enable the modeling of such relationships. We collect dense annotations of objects, attributes, and relationships within each image to learn these models. Specifically, our dataset contains over 108K images where each image has an average of 35\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$35$$\end{document} objects, 26\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$26$$\end{document} attributes, and 21\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$21$$\end{document} pairwise relationships between objects. We canonicalize the objects, attributes, relationships, and noun phrases in region descriptions and questions answer pairs to WordNet synsets. Together, these annotations represent the densest and largest dataset of image descriptions, objects, attributes, relationships, and question answer pairs.

GWAT: The Geneva Affective Picture Database WordNet Annotation Tool

WNtags: A Web-Based Tool For Image Labeling And Retrieval With Lexical Ontologies

SNPMap—An Integrated Visual SNP Interpretation Tool

Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotations

PanGEA: The Panoramic Graph Environment Annotation Toolkit

GeneAnnotator: A Semi-automatic Annotation Tool for Visual Scene Graph

GATE Teamware: a web-based, collaborative text annotation framework

WEB-based GEne SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WebGestalt): update 2013

WEGO: a web tool for plotting GO annotations

DAWT: Densely Annotated Wikipedia Texts across multiple languages

GEB+: A Benchmark for Generic Event Boundary Captioning, Grounding and Retrieval

Human computation: Image metadata acquisition based on a single-player annotation game

WebGestalt: an integrated system for exploring gene sets in various biological contexts

WikiGWA: an Open Platform for Collecting and Using Genome-Wide Association Results

GeoAnnotator: A Collaborative Semi-Automatic Platform for Constructing Geo-Annotated Text Corpora

The UniProt-GO Annotation database in 2011

GELATO and SAGE: An Integrated Framework for MS Annotation

DWUG: A large Resource of Diachronic Word Usage Graphs in Four Languages

GenomeTools: a comprehensive software library for efficient processing of structured genome annotations

Efficient indexing and querying of annotations in a pangenome graph

SugarDrawer: A Web-Based Database Search Tool with Editing Glycan Structures