Proton Temperature Anisotropies in the Venus Plasma Environment During Solar Minimum and Maximum
Sebastián Rojas Mata,Gabriella Stenberg Wieser,Yoshifumi Futaana,Alexander Bader,Moa Persson,Andrey Fedorov,Tielong Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-653
2022-01-01
Abstract:Venus’ lack of an intrinsic magnetic field allows the solar wind to closely interact with its atmosphere [1], making it aprime target for investigating how unmagnetized atmospheric bodies in our Solar System [2] or elsewhere [3] interactwith magnetized plasma flows. This close interaction means that solar-activity correlations exhibited by the solar wind andother heliospheric parameters [4, 5] cause solar-cycle variations in Venus’ plasma environment and plasma phenomena. Weinvestigate these variations by characterizing the proton population around Venus during periods of solar minimum (2006–2009)and maximum (2010–2014). We use data from the Ion Mass Analyser (IMA) instrument, a particle mass-energy spectrometerwhich was onboard the Venus Express (VEX) mission. We apply a previously developed methodology which fits Maxwellianmodels to measurements of the protons’ velocity distribution functions [6] to produce statistical distributions of bulk speeds andtemperatures in various regions of Venus’ plasma environment. We also present spatial maps and probability-density histogramscomparing the proton parameters between the two time periods.We find that the temperatures perpendicular (T⊥) and parallel (T) to the background magnetic field are 20–35% lowerin the magnetosheath during solar maximum. This suggests that the heating of particles as they cross the bow shock variesbetween the two time periods. We also find that the regions in the magnetosheath with highest temperature ratio T⊥/T arefarther downstream from the bow shock during solar maximum than minimum. This is consistent with previous observations ofhow mirror-mode structures presumably generated at the bow shock strictly decay as they are convected into the magnetosheathduring solar minimum, whereas during solar maximum they first grow and then decay [7]. We also present ongoing work tofurther characterize the plasma environment as a function of upstream solar-wind parameters (such as Mach number or coneangle) and bow shock geometry. We discuss preliminary results concerning energy conversion processes at Venus’ bow shock.REFERENCES[1] Y. Futaana, G. Stenberg Wieser et al., “Solar Wind Interaction and Impact on the Venus Atmosphere,” Space Science Reviews, vol. 212, no. 3-4, 2017.[2] C. Bertucci, F. Duru et al., The induced magnetospheres of mars, venus, and titan, 2011, vol. 162, no. 1-4.[3] C. Dong, M. Jin et al., “Atmospheric escape from the TRAPPIST-1 planets and implications for habitability,” Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences of the United States of America, vol. 115, no. 2, 2017.[4] C. T. Russell, E. Chou et al., “Solar and interplanetary control of the location of the Venus bow shock,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 93, no. A6, 1988.[5] P. R. Gazis, “Solar cycle variation in the heliosphere,” Reviews of Geophysics, vol. 34, no. 3, 1996.[6] A. Bader, G. Stenberg Wieser et al., “Proton Temperature Anisotropies in the Plasma Environment of Venus,” Journal of Geophysical Research: SpacePhysics, vol. 124, no. 5, 2019.[7] M. Volwerk, D. Schmid et al., “Mirror mode waves in Venus’s magnetosheath: Solar minimum vs. solar maximum,” Annales Geophysicae, vol. 34, no. 11, 2016.