Achieving Diverse and Monoallelic Olfactory Receptor Selection Through Dual-Objective Optimization Design

Xiao-Jun Tian,Hang Zhang,Jens Sannerud,Jianhua Xing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601722113

2016-05-10

Abstract:Multiple-objective optimization is common in biological systems. In the mammalian olfactory system, each sensory neuron stochastically expresses only one out of up to thousands of olfactory receptor (OR) gene alleles; at organism level the types of expressed ORs need to be maximized. Existing models focus only on monoallele activation, and cannot explain recent observations in mutants, especially the reduced global diversity of expressed ORs in G9a/GLP knockouts. In this work we integrated existing information on OR expression, and constructed a comprehensive model that has all its components based on physical interactions. Analyzing the model reveals an evolutionarily optimized three-layer regulation mechanism, which includes zonal segregation, epigenetic barrier crossing coupled to a negative feedback loop that mechanistically differs from previous theoretical proposals, and a previously unidentified enhancer competition step. This model not only recapitulates monoallelic OR expression, but also elucidates how the olfactory system maximizes and maintains the diversity of OR expression, and has multiple predictions validated by existing experimental results. Through making analogy to a physical system with thermally activated barrier crossing and comparative reverse engineering analyses, the study reveals that the olfactory receptor selection system is optimally designed, and particularly underscores cooperativity and synergy as a general design principle for multi-objective optimization in biology.

Molecular Networks,Neurons and Cognition

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: How to ensure that each olfactory sensory neuron (OSN) in the mammalian olfactory system expresses only a single allele of one olfactory receptor (OR) gene, while maximizing the diversity of OR expression in the entire neuron population. Specifically, the research aims to explain the following two basic requirements:

1. **Single - allele expression**: Each OSN randomly selects and expresses only a single allele of one OR gene.
2. **Maximum diversity**: In the neuron population, the expression frequencies of all OR gene alleles are approximately equal to maximize the sensitivity and specificity of the olfactory system.

These two requirements form the core challenges of the multi - objective optimization problem. Existing models mainly focus on single - allele activation and cannot explain some experimental observations in mutants, such as the reduction in OR diversity expression in G9a/GLP knockout mice. Therefore, this paper proposes a new comprehensive model to explain these phenomena through physical interaction mechanisms and reveals how the olfactory receptor selection system has evolved and been optimized.

### Specific problem summary:
- **Single - allele expression**: Why does each OSN only express a single allele of one OR gene?
- **Maximum diversity**: How to ensure that the most types of OR genes are expressed and evenly distributed in the entire neuron population?

### Research methods and findings:
The researchers constructed a mathematical model of a three - layer regulatory mechanism by integrating existing experimental information, including:
1. **Regional separation**: Different OR alleles are expressed in different regions of the olfactory epithelium.
2. **Epigenetic barrier crossing and negative feedback loop**: Single - allele selection is achieved through changes in histone modification states (such as the transition from H3K9me3 to H3K4me3).
3. **Enhancer competition**: The enhancer competition mechanism is introduced to further ensure single - allele expression and suppress multi - allele co - expression.

Through this model, the researchers were not only able to explain the problems of single - allele expression and maximum diversity, but also predicted some existing experimental results and proposed new experimental hypotheses.