Abstract:Analyses of human reaction to economic incentives reveal contradictory deviations from maximization. For example, underinvestment in the stock market suggests risk aversion, but insufficient diversification of financial assets suggests risk-seeking. Leading explanations for these contradictions assume that different choice environments (e.g., different framings) trigger different biases. Our analysis shows that variation in the choice environment is not a necessary condition. It demonstrates how certain changes in the incentive structure are sufficient to trigger six pairs of contradictory deviations from maximization even when the choice environment is fixed. Moreover, our analysis shows that the direction of these deviations can be captured by assuming that choice propensities reflect reliance on small samples of past experiences. In order to clarify the underlying processes, we considered distinct models of the reliance on small samples assumption, and compared them to classical models of choice (including prospect theory). The comparison focused on both within-individual, and between-group predictions (based on a preregistered study with 120 new tasks). The results reveal large advantage of "wide sampling" models that (in the static settings we examine) approximate an effort to rely on the most similar past experiences. Surprisingly, we also found that assuming that the parameters reflect stable individual traits impairs predictions; it seems that the number of "most similar past experiences" for each individual varies from task to task. These results suggest that ignoring the predictable impact of the incentive structure can lead to exaggeration of the importance of environment- and individual-specific decision biases. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

On the Failures of Bonus Plans

Optimal Control of DC Pension Plan Management under Two Incentive Schemes

Implicit Incentives for Fund Managers with Partial Information

On the psychology of bonuses: The effects of loss aversion and Yerkes-Dodson law on performance in cognitively and mechanically demanding tasks

Relation,Moral Hazard,and Effective Managerial Incentives

Capital Budgeting and Compensation with Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard

Optimal Management of DB Pension Fund under Both Underfunded and Overfunded Cases

Risk vs. profit potential: A model for corporate strategy

Incentives and Matching of Heterogeneous Principals and Agents: Field Evidence from a Mutual Fund Scandal

Bonus-penalty wage contract based on target output

Why Stocks May Disappoint

Optimal investment strategy for the DC plan with the return of premiums clauses in a mean–variance framework

Optimal Executive Compensation when Firm Size Follows Geometric Brownian Motion

Cost-efficient payoffs under model ambiguity

Robust two-player differential investment game of defined contribution pension plans under multiple risks

Portfolio Optimization under Convex Incentive Schemes

Contradictory deviations from maximization: Environment-specific biases, or reflections of basic properties of human learning?

Incentivizing Exploration with Heterogeneous Value of Money

Managers' Investment Timing Decisions under Endogenous Compensation Contracts

Managerial compensation with hyperbolic discounting

Power of Bonus in Pricing for Crowdsourcing