Limitations of Label-Free Sensors in Serum Based Molecular Diagnostics

Manoj M. Varma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1505.01032

2015-05-05

Abstract:Immunoassay formats applicable for clinical or point-of-care diagnostics fall into two broad classes. One which uses labeled secondary antibodies for signal transduction and the other which does not require the use of any labels. Comparison of the limits of detection (LoD) reported by these two sensing approaches over a wide range of detection techniques and target molecules in serum revealed that labeled techniques achieve 2-3 orders of magnitude better LoDs. Further, a vast majority of commercial tests and recent examples of technology translations are based on labeled assay formats. In light of this data, it is argued that extension of traditional labeled approaches and enhancing their functionality may have better clinical impact than the development of newer label-free techniques.

Biological Physics,Instrumentation and Detectors,Quantitative Methods

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to explore the limitations of label - free sensors in serum - based molecular diagnostics and compare them with labeled immunoassay techniques. Specifically, by analyzing the limit of detection (LoD) of different detection methods, the author reveals the significant differences in detection sensitivity between labeled and label - free techniques. The study finds that the limit of detection of labeled techniques is 2 - 3 orders of magnitude better than that of label - free techniques. In addition, most commercial tests and recent examples of technology transfer are based on labeled detection formats. Based on these data, the author believes that expanding traditional labeled methods and enhancing their functions may have a greater impact on clinical applications than developing new label - free techniques.

The core issue of the paper is to evaluate the performance differences between labeled and label - free immunoassay techniques in serum - based molecular diagnostics, especially their limit of detection (LoD). Through comparative analysis, the author aims to provide an objective evaluation of which technique is more suitable for clinical diagnosis.