Indoor Visible Light Positioning Based on Channel Estimation and Cramér–Rao Low Bound Analysis with Random Receiving Orientation of User Equipment
Lijun Deng,Yangyu Fan,Qiong Zhao,Pengfei Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10070812
IF: 2.536
2023-01-01
Photonics
Abstract:The accuracy of line-of-sight (LOS)-based indoor visible light positioning (VLP) depends directly on the accuracy of the received LOS power. In an actual indoor visible light communication (VLC) system, the total received power contains the LOS power and diffuse power, and the proportion of diffuse component varies significantly with the receiving orientation of the user equipment (UE). In the trilateration positioning process, this is bound to bring a very high level of inaccuracy for at least one or two of them when determining the distance between the positioned LED and UE. To solve this problem, we employed channel estimation and Parseval’s theorem to remove the diffuse component from the total received power. The simulation results show that the higher the channel estimation accuracy, the smaller the discrepancy between the estimated and actual LOS power, and the greater the localization accuracy. At the same channel estimation accuracy, the comparison results demonstrate that the localization performance of the proposed method is higher than LLS-1, in which the total received power is directly adopted to estimate the distance. The localization performance of LLS-2 deteriorates significantly compared to the proposed method. This result indicates that the receiving orientation cannot be neglected during the distance estimation process even though the estimated accuracy of LOS power is high. Deriving the Cramér–Rao low bound (CRLB) for LOS-based indoor VLP with receiving orientation, we compared the localization performance for the proposed method with LLS-1, LLS-2, and the CRLB at various signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). The results show that the localization error of all the received positions in the room can reach the CRLB at approximately 25 dB. However, localization errors based on LLS-1 and LLS-2 cannot achieve the theoretical CRLB even at a high SNR.