Abstract:In this paper, we aim at providing researchers and practitioners alike with a roadmap detailing the current research trends in the field of network visualization. We design our contribution as a meta‐survey where we discuss, summarize, and categorize recent surveys and task taxonomies published in the context of network visualization. Networks are abstract and ubiquitous data structures, defined as a set of data points and relationships between them. Network visualization provides meaningful representations of these data, supporting researchers in understanding the connections, gathering insights, and detecting and identifying unexpected patterns. Research in this field is focusing on increasingly challenging problems, such as visualizing dynamic, complex, multivariate, and geospatial networked data. This ever‐growing, and widely varied, body of research led to several surveys being published, each covering one or more disciplines of network visualization. Despite this effort, the variety and complexity of this research represents an obstacle when surveying the domain and building a comprehensive overview of the literature. Furthermore, there exists a lack of clarification and uniformity between the terminology used in each of the surveys, which requires further effort when mapping and categorizing the plethora of different visualization techniques and approaches. In this paper, we aim at providing researchers and practitioners alike with a "roadmap" detailing the current research trends in the field of network visualization. We design our contribution as a meta‐survey where we discuss, summarize, and categorize recent surveys and task taxonomies published in the context of network visualization. We identify more and less saturated disciplines of research and consolidate the terminology used in the surveyed literature. We also survey the available task taxonomies, providing a comprehensive analysis of their varying support to each network visualization discipline and by establishing and discussing a classification for the individual tasks. With this combined analysis of surveys and task taxonomies, we provide an overarching structure of the field, from which we extrapolate the current state of research and promising directions for future work.

Visualizing Cartograms: Goals and Task Taxonomy

Task-Based Effectiveness of Interactive Contiguous Area Cartograms

Cartogram Visualization for Bivariate Geo-Statistical Data

Motivating Good Practices for the Creation of Contiguous Area Cartograms

Comparative evaluation of the web-based contiguous cartogram generation tool go-cart.io

A Literature-based Visualization Task Taxonomy for Gantt Charts

A Task-Based Taxonomy of Cognitive Biases for Information Visualization

Task-Based Effectiveness of Basic Visualizations

A State-of-the-Art Survey of Tasks for Tree Design and Evaluation With a Curated Task Dataset

Professional Differences: A Comparative Study of Visualization Task Performance and Spatial Ability Across Disciplines

A Typology of Decision-Making Tasks for Visualization

Are We There Yet? A Roadmap of Network Visualization from Surveys to Task Taxonomies

Data scale as cartography: a semi-automatic approach for thematic web map creation

Communicative Visualizations as a Learning Problem

Cartography-Oriented Design of 3D Geospatial Information Visualization – Overview and Techniques

Using dynamic circles and squares to visualize spatio-temporal variation

Visualization Atlases: Explaining and Exploring Complex Topics through Data, Visualization, and Narration

Do you want to promote recall, perceptions, or behavior? The best data visualization depends on the communication goal

Field Cognitive Styles on Visual Cognition in the Event Structure Design of Bivariate Interactive Dorling Cartogram—The Similarities and Differences of Field-Independent and Field-Dependent Users

Rectangular Cartogram Visualization Interface for Social Networks

Narrative Cartography with Knowledge Graphs